Feeds

Intel turns its back on the small screen

Will design chips for computers, not TVs

Business security measures using SSL

Intel will no longer try to get its system-on-a-chip products inside TVs having largely failed to persuade telly makers to do so.

A company spokeswoman told Bloomberg that the designers and engineers working on Intel's CE chippery will shift their focus to products for computers, tablets and phones.

Intel has been trying to win over TV manufacturers for the best part of five years. It's first real consumer electronics-oriented SoC, the CE2110, launched in April 2007, but it had been evangelising the product category before then.

The CE2110 was one of Intel's last ARM-based parts. The following year, in Sepetmber 2008, Intel shifted the line to its own x86 architecture with the CE3110, an SoC that was superseded in September 2009 by the CE4100, Intel's first CE-centric part based on its Atom processor.

Intel promotes Atom SoCs for CE apps

No longer

It had high hopes for the part. The CE2110 and CE3110 were essentially foot-in-the-door products - it was the CE4100 that was going to really get the company into tellies and set-top boxes.

At launch, Intel CEO Paul Otellini told journalists that the chip giant would be selling more SoCs than mainstream CPUs by 2014.

That goal looks a lot less certain now - Intel makes SoCs for other applications than CE kit. The only name customers it has had are US cable company Comcast, which picked the CE line for a set-top box, and Sony and Logitech, which used the CE4100 in their Google TV products - a service that has singularly failed to set the TV world alight.

Yet, TV makers have never been keener to promote the concept of the "Smart TV" - a telly with internet connectivity and the ability to run apps linked to a range of social networking and IPTV services.

So there's demand there for smart TV-oriented chips. If Intel no longer believes it can satisfy that craving, it either couldn't match its competitors on price - or its Atom chippery justisn't up to snuff. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Oi, Tim Cook. Apple Watch. I DARE you to tell me, IN PERSON, that it's secure
State attorney demands Apple CEO bows the knee to him
4K-ing excellent TV is on its way ... in its own sweet time, natch
For decades Hollywood actually binned its 4K files. Doh!
Phones 4u website DIES as wounded mobe retailer struggles to stay above water
Founder blames 'ruthless network partners' for implosion
DARPA-backed jetpack prototype built to make soldiers run faster
4 Minute Mile project hatched to speed up tired troops
Hey, Mac fanbois. HGST wants you drooling over its HUGE desktop RACK
What vast digital media repository could possibly need 64 TERABYTES?
Apple Pay is a tidy payday for Apple with 0.15% cut, sources say
Cupertino slurps 15 cents from every $100 purchase
Apple's ONE LESS THING: the iPod Classic disappears
RIP 2001 – 2014. MP3 player beloved of millions. Killed by cloud
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
WIN a very cool portable ZX Spectrum
Win a one-off portable Spectrum built by legendary hardware hacker Ben Heck
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Protecting users from Firesheep and other Sidejacking attacks with SSL
Discussing the vulnerabilities inherent in Wi-Fi networks, and how using TLS/SSL for your entire site will assure security.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.