The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Oracle tweaks MySQL with milestone update

NoSQL ain’t the only story in town

Magic Quadrant for Enterprise Backup/Recovery

OpenWorld While the news about NoSQL has garnered much attention, Oracle has quietly published a development milestone release (DMR) for MySQL.

The MySQL 5.6.3 DMR includes a major revision of the software’s optimizer, which the company claims will make file-sort optimizations up to three times faster by searching more intelligently and dumping unneeded data during the process.

Index condition pushdowns were also speeded up, with Oracle reporting that operation times for the function had been cut from 15 seconds down to 90 milliseconds.

Batched Key Access has been added to augment the Multi-Range Read capabilities added in the 5.6.2 DMR, enabling indexes to be sorted by data sequence for faster searching. In tests this dropped some execution times from 2000 seconds to 10, albeit with a “sufficiently large” join buffer.

More instrumentation has been added to the performance schema in the new release and further improvements have been made in InnoDB and replication.

With over 40 sessions devoted to MySQL at the Oracle OpenWorld conference this week, it’s clear that the company is maintaining its investment in the MySQL code. That said, some developers have commented privately that they fear for the long-term development of the platform, particularly its perceived creeping commercialization.

What you need to know about cloud backup

Latest Comments
Anonymous Coward

MySQL help needed

Hi all,

my company is trying to persuade me that we can use MySQL the company critical work, whereas I'm trying to push them towards something grown-up. I can give them my (unimpressive) experiences of MySQL, and various bits from other places to try and discourage them including its dire track record, but can anyone point to serious flaws in the thing as it stands (I know there were disastrous bugs but they seem to have been fixed by now). I can make a pretty good case already, but I want something really damning.

Bear in mind that to them a database is just a database, whether at the Access or MSSQL, so that the one is effectively free and the other costs thousands that means that they'll go for the cheap one (although I'm getting there... I shall prevail...)

(NB Scalability is not an issue for us)

0
2

More from The Register

Nuke plants to rely on PDP-11 code UNTIL 2050!
Programmers and their walking sticks converge in Canada
Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry
Apple at WWDC: Sleek new iOS, death of the big cats, pint-sized Mac Pro
CEO Cook: 'The biggest change to iOS since the introduction of the iPhone'