Feeds

I/O holds up the traffic in virtual systems

Clearing the bottlenecks

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

We can now host 512 virtual machines on a single physical server. That's a lot of virtual machines trying to squeeze a lot of I/O out of a single server's networking interfaces.

Meanwhile, vSphere 5 is out.

It arrived with an indeterminately large quantity of truly outstanding features that were completely overshadowed by a new licensing model which imposes a hefty fine for using most of them.

Customer feedback prompted some revisiting of that licensing philosophy.

VMWare made a far more interesting move on the low end. The company upgraded the free version of the hypervisor with some new features, including a change of the RAM allowance from 256GB to 32GB.

This naturally led to fierce debates on internet forums and gave tech blogs everywhere plenty to write about.

Minority report

The change was bad for my customers. Determining what to do has occupied a great deal of my time and led to some interesting discoveries.

In late 2011, the virtualisation discussion has moved beyond “virtualising your servers”. You are either virtualised or you are not, in which case you are in a steadily evaporating minority that even niche players don’t really want to deal with anymore.

In a virtualised world, VMWare makes the best operating system to install on the bare metal of your x86 server. Many competitors are struggling to match features that are two major versions old. At best, they are competing against VMWare’s last product release.

Against this backdrop I must measure VMWare’s changes to ESXi. Modern servers are so fast and so powerful that only VMWare seems able to actually make use of them.

In many cases, the ability to fill up a system’s RAM with virtual machines means nothing if the underlying hypervisor can’t keep up with the demands on I/O.

Losing cards

I have servers in the field running 8Gbit network interface cards (NICs) providing both SAN access as well as client-facing network ports. These servers run only 128GB of RAM – an average of a mere 25 virtual machines apiece – and they absolutely flatten those NICs all day long.

I have begun upgrading the heaviest usage servers to shiny new 10Gbit NICs, only to discover that these systems are perfectly capable of flattening four 10Gbit NICs as well.

You never really appreciate how powerful a pair of Xeons is until you have asked yourself: “Exactly how much I/O do I have to feed this monster before I have bandwidth to spare?”

The processor is no longer the bottleneck in the data centre

I have rarely had moments with other hypervisors where I stood back and said: “Gigabit Ethernet is dead.” My high-demand VMWare systems, however, constantly remind me of this truth.

Except for some very rare corner cases, the processor is no longer the bottleneck in the data centre. I/O is.

In this brave new world, he who can shuffle bits around the quickest wins. Being the best at coping with this I/O bottleneck is what allows VMWare to get away with anything it wants – for the moment, at least.

Some of the systems I am running are two and even three years old. Their replacements will be able to house even more virtual machines and chow down on even more bandwidth.

My Christmas list now reads: "Dear Santa, I would like several gold bars, a pony and a crate of Intel 4up 10 Gigabit Ethernet NICs. I am going to need them."

Price wars

When contemplating the conundrum of VMWare's new licensing, I find I have four choices.

I can choose to port my virtual estate to a competitor and accept that the I/O limitations of its hypervisors impose practical limits on how many virtual machines I can cram into a single host. Competitor offerings are also far less feature-rich, but even at the top end they are significantly cheaper.

I can stick with VMWare’s free hypervisor, but this will see massive server sprawl as I constantly run up against the 32GB server barrier.

I can choose to run a hybrid environment, keeping the high-I/O stuff on VMWare and migrating everything else to competitors. Or I can just pay the tithe.

Whichever path I choose, one thing is abundantly clear. Whether we are talking hypervisors, networking, storage or any other aspect of modern server design, I/O has become the primary consideration.

Great news if you make hypervisors, storage or networking gear. Less so for my wallet. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
George Clooney, WikiLeaks' lawyer wife hand out burner phones to wedding guests
Day 4: 'News'-papers STILL rammed with Clooney nuptials
iPAD-FONDLING fanboi sparks SECURITY ALERT at Sydney airport
Breaches screening rules cos Apple SCREEN ROOLZ, ok?
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
A moment of brilliance? UPnP for Internet of Stuff lightbulbs
Thus doth tech of future illuminate present, etc
Apple's new iPhone 6 vulnerable to last year's TouchID fingerprint hack
But unsophisticated thieves need not attempt this trick
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.