Feeds

Brands stiffed by .xxx briefs' cock-ups

Hard-up firms can't afford to waste cash...

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

Half of all attempts to protect trademarks from the new .xxx internet extension could be failing due to lawyers' inability to RTFM*.

That appears to be the conclusion of one company handling applications to prevent trademark-infringing use of the new adults-only top-level domain.

The .xxx extension, operated by ICM Registry, is in its "sunrise" period, during which trademark-holders can apply to have their brands blocked permanently from the space.

EnCirca, a domain name registrar, said this week that 50 per cent of all the blocks it is processing contain errors. This could prove costly to trademark owners.

Under ICM's rules, a sunrise application that contains erroneous information must be re-filed and paid for a second time. Most registrars are charging $200 to $300 to handle these filings.

According to EnCirca, many companies that have a trademark that includes ".com" are applying to get a .xxx domain that excludes the .com in favour of .xxx.

But the sunrise rules state that applications must be for an exact-match string only, excluding non-compliant symbols, so the owner of a trademark on "example.com" would only be able to block "examplecom.xxx", not "example.xxx".

EnCirca points out that a parallel ICM sunrise process enables companies to apply to defensively register a .xxx domain if they own a matching string in another extension. Those registrations would incur a recurring annual registration fee, however.

ICM says that the proportion of bad applications across all of its 70-plus registrars is much smaller.

"EnCirca can only be commenting on the applications it has seen," said ICM president Stuart Lawley. "The average is well under 20 per cent."

The .xxx sunrise period, which runs until 28 October, is expected to be the most over-subscribed domain launch since .eu in 2006, due largely to companies outside of the porn business terrified that cybersquatters will register their .xxx brands and hold them to ransom.

ICM confirmed to El Reg earlier this month that the sunrise phase, which started 7 September, processed more than 10,000 defensive applications just in its first week, beating its projections for the whole 52-day period.

The company had set its fee – $162 wholesale to registrars – based on 10,000 blocks being paid for, so it will almost certainly turn a profit selling these non-resolving domain names. It is estimated that the final tally will be at least double that target.

After the sunrise has finished, ICM plans to launch a "landrush" period, starting 8 November.

During landrush, anybody with a burning desire to get their grubby paws on a .xxx domain will be able to pay a premium price in order to attempt to secure a potentially valuable address without the need for a trademark or a pre-existing registration. Any contested domains will be fought over at auction.

The .xxx extension will go into general availability, with prices averaging around $100 per domain per year, on 6 December. ®

* Read the Fucking Manual – join any El Reg comments thread for further elucidation...

Intelligent flash storage arrays

More from The Register

next story
Mighty Blighty broadbanders beg: Let us lay cable in BT's, er, ducts
Complain to Ofcom that telco has 'effective monopoly'
Download alert: Nearly ALL top 100 Android, iOS paid apps hacked
Attack of the Clones? Yeah, but much, much scarier – report
Broadband sellers in the UK are UP TO no good, says Which?
Speedy network claims only apply to 10% of customers
Yahoo! blames! MONSTER! email! OUTAGE! on! CUT! CABLE! bungle!
Weekend woe for BT as telco struggles to restore service
Fujitsu CTO: We'll be 3D-printing tech execs in 15 years
Fleshy techie disses network neutrality, helmet-less motorcyclists
Facebook, working on Facebook at Work, works on Facebook. At Work
You don't want your cat or drunk pics at the office
Soz, web devs: Google snatches its Wallet off the table
Killing off web service in 3 months... but app-happy bonkers are fine
prev story

Whitepapers

Choosing cloud Backup services
Demystify how you can address your data protection needs in your small- to medium-sized business and select the best online backup service to meet your needs.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Driving business with continuous operational intelligence
Introducing an innovative approach offered by ExtraHop for producing continuous operational intelligence.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?