The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

ISPs get flimsy self-help leaflet on net speed ads

'Up to' and 'unlimited' claims lightly poked

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

A so-called "Help Note" has been published this morning that offers guidance to advertisers when flogging broadband based on attractive speed claims.

However, the set of recommendations (12-page PDF/41KB) do not form a self-regulatory framework as some ISPs such as Virgin Media might have liked.

Instead the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said the guidelines should be regarded when its council is mulling over whether contentious "up to" speed claims in broadband ads comply with the relevant Advertising Code.

The Committee of Advertising Practice (CAP) and the Broadcast Committee of Advertising Practice (BCAP) jointly penned the Use of speed claims in broadband advertising document, which was published today.

"CAP and BCAP guidance is intended to help advertisers, agencies and media owners interpret the Codes but is not a substitute for them," it noted.

"This Help Note reflects CAP and BCAP's intended effect of the Codes but neither constitutes new rules nor binds the ASA Council in the event of a complaint about a marketing communication that follows it."

If an ISP's ad fails to take into account the recommendations detailed in the Help Note then the ASA will step in and ask the advertiser to justify why it chose to flout the guidelines. But this happens only after complaints have been received.

The telco would also be required to demonstrate that, despite ignoring the Help Note, it hadn't misled the consumer.

"Where advertisers make a numerical speed claim to be understood by consumers as maximum speed of their service, they should be able to demonstrate that the speed is achievable for at least 10 per cent of the relevant customer base," reads the document under a "Policy" heading.

"This applies to a claim wherever it appears in the marketing communication and if the claim is a part of the name of the service," it added, before offering the following caveat:

"Marketers may, however, choose to round their maximum speed claims down to a figure that is more convenient for marketing purposes."

The ASA, it said, would "judge each [complaint] submission on a case-by-case basis".

Broadband speed testing varies due to a variety of different factors, said the Help Note, therefore the guideline does not "require a specific method or approach to gathering and processing" such data.

Advertisers are expected to consider "relevant factors" that can affect broadband speeds, including signal attenuation and traffic/network management.

Virgin Media, which in July this year called on the ASA to "bring about a rapid change in the way broadband services are being advertised", still managed to describe the Help Note as a "massive win for consumers".

Some customers may disagree with that enthusiastic response given that these are guidelines rather than set-in-stone rules, but arguably "up to" and "unlimited" broadband speed claims in ads will – from April 2012 – become that bit harder to use in British marketing campaigns.

"The new rules are a big step in the right direction and the greater transparency will ensure people can make more informed choices," said Virgin Media exec Jon James.

"ISPs will no longer be able to hide behind generic terms or catch-all claims which they simply cannot deliver. However there needs to be vigilant scrutiny to ensure this is genuinely applied to all marketing and that the spirit behind this demand for change is upheld, not just the minimum necessary is done to be acceptable."

He added that VM only advertises speeds that at least 90 per cent of the ISP's customers receive.

“Ofcom has shone a torch on this issue by publishing regular speed reports which have, together with pressure from the government, consumer groups and thousands of customers across the country, helped push for this critical change," said James. ®

Cloud based data management

Unlimited

I'm totally confused as to why "up to" gets so much bad press, when it is both clear and true. Yet, at the same time 'unlimited' gets almost no coverage despite in many cases being a blatant lie.

3
0

No because the speed you get has nothing to do with the speed I get. It would be like quoting the average speed of a car on British roads. A useless figure that tells the individual nothing about how long their journey is going to take.

There is nothing inherently wrong with 'up to'. It is an accurate technical description of rate adaptive DSL. As long as there is small print on the advert saying 'actual speed depends on the quality of your line' it's fine. People ought to be sensible enough to know that adverts are there to catch the eye and that you should enquire further when buying the product. As long as when you sign up the ISP provides you with an estimating tool and encourages you to use it there should be no problem.

Another problem is that sync speeds are not under the control of most ISPs because they don't own the telephone line. The only way they can improve their average speed is to refuse to supply to people on lower quality lines.

A further problem (and even VM have this one) is that once you leave your ISP's network they lose all control. Going back to the road analogy it's like knowing the average speed of vehicles moving around your town. Not particularly useful even if that's all your doing but if you're actually setting off on holiday and intend to drive to France then it's utterly pointless.

Meanwhile the thing that ISPs /do/ control and the term which is abused beyond any excusing is 'unlimited'. What do the ASA say about? "Carry on chaps, we don't care".

1
0

How about these rules?

If you advertise up to x Mb/s, then 20% of your customers should get better than 80% of this speed, and 80% should get better than 20% of it.

If you advertise a service as unlimited, the correlation coefficient between usage and speed should not be significantly different from zero.

If you claim 24 hour service, 80% of the time you should provide 20% of that users maximum service.

never gonna happen, I guess ...

1
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?
 breaking news
White Space wonga time: White House tips $100m into next-gen comms
Empty frequencies right place for tomorrow's mics, phones and fridges