The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Brits not keen on 3D, reveals poll

But they'll happily be told they have to watch it, anyway

Reg Hardware readers last year voted 3DTV the Rusty Dodo in the Reg Hardware Awards, and it seems Brits aren't too keen on the technology when its used in the cinema, either.

Pollster YouGov this week revealed that 41 per cent of punters - it interviewed just under 3000 of us - think that 3D is just a gimmick.

Some 47 per cent said 3D either does nothing for a film or makes it worse. Only 22 per cent stating the technology improves the cinemagoing experience, though only 19 per cent said it actually gives the film itself a boost.

Despite this, there's a certain ambivalence among the British public - clearly we're becoming a nation of fence-sitters - when it comes to picking which version of a film to see.

Given a choice of seeing a film in 2D or 3D, 47 per cent said they'd choose 3D, but only 37 per cent said they'd pick the 2D option. There was no resounding vote in favour of avoiding 3D because it costs more, either.

So, yes, 3D doesn't do anything for the film, and it costs more but we'll let the cinema chains shove us into 3D viewings anyway.

More of us would be keener on 3D if it didn't require glasses, but only 52 per cent - again, hardly a ringing endorsement. Some 40 per cent don't care one way or t'other.

You can read the full survey results at YouGov's website. ®

£10 a pop!

I was horrified at the price for a ticket to see a film that was only available in 3D. A few pence short of a tenner a ticket! Not only do they want me to sit through a film with 3D that looks like moving cardboard cutouts, is somewhat dimmer than it's 2D counterpart, requires me to purchase some uncomfortable plastic glasses and occasionally results in headaches. But they want to charge me a little less than it would to buy the film on DVD shortly after release?

I will be giving the cinema a miss thanks. I have my own at home that comes with a pause button, I can eat my own food, the seats are more comfy and don't have someone constantly kicking the back of it.

10
0

2D Please

I will always go for the 2D version. Mainly because I already wear glasses and being forced to wear a second pair is.... cumbersome.

7
1

babestation

should be sued under the trade description act......

3
0

3D? Pah...

In my experience, 3D noticeably detracts from the experience, so I actively avoid them. And if a movie is only available in 3D, then I don't watch it in the cinema.

2
0

I've not noticed the choice?

I know the trailers usually say 'Also available in 2D'. But my local plex hasn't had it on in two screens at the same time with the choice of 2 or 3D.

So...I have to be apathetic about choosing 3D.

2
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Microsoft reveals Xbox One, the console that can read your heartbeat
Upgrades Live service – and no always-on requirement
US boffin builds 32-way Raspberry Pi cluster
Beowulf cluster built for the price of a single PC
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Fairphone goes on sale to all
The Android handset that's PC can be yours
Nintendo throws flaming legal barrel at YouTubing fans
All your walk-through vid revenue are belong to us
Startup hires 'cyborg' Mann for Google Glass–killer project
3D augmented reality specs coming your way this year

Hands on with Hyper-V 3.0 and virtual machine movement

Our award-winning Regcasts have teamed up with training provider QA for the deepest of deep dives into Hyper-V, including a live demo.

Understand VM movement - just click to play, or go here for a bigger version.