Feeds

Police authority loves Sprint ii buying regime

Too expensive? Did we say that?

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

West Midlands Police Authority (WMPA) has retracted claims that the Sprint ii procurement agreement was more expensive than other options.

The controversial single-supplier pan-public sector agreement has been much maligned since police forces in England and Wales were mandated to use it from March.

WMPA also questioned projected cost savings, as exclusively revealed by El Reg. Northants Police was another prominent critic of the framework.

In its 2010/11 Annual Procurement Report, WMPA stated that buying kit via SCC, the huge reseller firm, and Sprint ii was 13 per cent more expensive on average than other routes, and that it wanted to bypass the framework.

However, Jackie Courtney, chief executive at WMPA claimed this week that she has "made a delegated urgent decision" to retract those comments.

"West Midlands Police Authority has been made aware that the statements relating to Sprint II and Specialist Computer Centres plc ... as presented to Finance and Resources Committee on 21 July 2011 are incorrect and were included by the report author in error.

"West Midlands Police has therefore advised the Authority that the two paragraphs should be retracted from the report. The Authority has accepted this request," she added.

The Home Office cast doubts over the future of Sprint ii last month when it revealed plans to form a police ICT company to combine the forces' procurement power, admitting it will review the framework next Spring.

The sudden reversal on the claims made in the Annual Report would suggest that the National Policing Improvement Agency came down heavily on its author for daring to publicly criticise Sprint ii, a cynic might say.

In a statement sent to El Reg, an SCC spokeswoman said: “SCC welcomes the full retraction by West Midlands Police Authority and will continue to work with the NPIA to deliver significant cashable and efficient savings for Forces.”

SCC is headquartered in Birmingham in the West Midlands and describes itself as Europe's biggest independent IT group. The company operates in six European countries and is the UK's second biggest IT reseller, after Computacenter.

WMPA representatives were unavailable for comment at the time of publication. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.