Feeds

BT bitchslapped for misleading 'Join now' Infinity ad

ASA ruling after Virgin Media complains to watchdog

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

The war of words between Virgin Media and BT has once again landed on the steps of the UK's advertising watchdog, which upheld one out of three complaints brought by Virgin Media against its rival ISP.

The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said that it agreed with Virgin Media's concerns that a BT press ad with the statements “most of our customers are already seeing at least three times faster speeds” and “Join now ...” were misleading.

It said that would-be customers would interpret such declarations as meaning that BT's next-generation broadband service was already available to most, if not all, punters.

However, the ASA didn't uphold a complaint brought by Virgin Media against another BT press ad punting the telco's Infinity service, because while BT claimed that the service had "arrived" the company added in the small print that coverage was currently limited.

The ASA noted that BT had been upfront with readers of that ad, but had not been so clear in the advert that called on would-be customers to "Join now", because that advert failed to "indicate that the service has limited availability".

BT responded to the complaint that was upheld by the ASA by explaining that the "Join now" claim in the ad was an error, and added that in future the company would ensure that it made clear in the body copy of the ad that not all customers would be able to get the service.

On the "increased by three times" claim, BT said it was clear from the ad that it was referring to Infinity customers.

The ASA disagreed and ruled that the ad was misleading and said it mustn't appear in its original form.

A third advert placed on BT's website was also cleared by the ASA, after Virgin Media challenged a 20Mbit/s broadband product that it claimed might mislead customers into thinking it was based on fibre optic technology.

In its adjudication, the ASA wrote:

"We noted however that text in the paragraphs above the claim explained that BT Infinity was [its] 'new fibre optic broadband' and that the claim at issue itself stated 'If you can't get BT Infinity just yet, order up to 20Mbit/s broadband instead and we'll upgrade you to Infinity if and when it becomes available' which we considered made clear to readers that the 20Mbit/s service referred to was not a fibre optic product."

The ASA ruling is here. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
FCC, Google cast eye over millimetre wireless
The smaller the wave, the bigger 5G's chances of success
It's even GRIMMER up North after MEGA SKY BROADBAND OUTAGE
By 'eck! Eccles cake production thrown into jeopardy
Mobile coverage on trains really is pants
You thought it was just *insert your provider here*, but now we have numbers
Don't mess with Texas ('cos it's getting Google Fiber and you're not)
A bit late, but company says 1Gbps Austin network almost ready to compete with AT&T
HBO shocks US pay TV world: We're down with OTT. Netflix says, 'Gee'
This affects every broadcaster, every cable guy
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.