The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Why was Duke Nukem Forever s**t?

Developer demands answers

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Game developer Gearbox has put together an online survey asking for feedback on its widely-panned game Duke Nukem Forever.

When the shooter was released in June after 14 years of delay after delay and almost unflagging anticipation, it was hit by stonkingly bad reviews. Aside from the super cool launch party, we weren't too pleased with our own Duke Nukem Forever experience either.

Duke Nukem Forever

Your chance to put the boot in

With the company already talking up plans to continue the franchise, it clearly feels a reminder is needed of where it all went wrong.

"Gearbox prides itself in listening to the community, and this is your chance to tell us how you feel about Duke Nukem Forever," the DNF survey reads. You don't have to have played the game - or at least not admit to the fact - to submit your thoughts.

Unfortunately, all opinions are anonymous and private, so we can't pick out some hilariously negative submissions for your entertainment. Feel free to write your own in our comments box before sending it off to Gearbox, though. ®

Customer Success Testimonial: Recovery is Everything

Anonymous Coward

How can you give them proper feedback if all you're doing is regurgitating what reviewers told you about the game? Given that you aren't even interested in a sequel means your opinions would be worth even less to them.

9
0
Anonymous Coward

Endless indistinguishable corridors?

Did you ever play the original Duke 3D? Thousands of textures, spread across (IIRC) 16 .ART files (held within the main duke3D.grp archive)- and used to great effect to create some pretty impressive scenery. Even now you can look at screenshots and say 'that's duke 3D'. From cracks in the ground to submarines to space-stations, it really was a fantastically varied game.

The level design was great too- it's the earliest 3D shooter I can think of off the top of my head that had crawling through air vents, working mirrors, multi-layered levels (which are a bitch to work with in a 2D level editor :P), a character with visible legs, security cameras, an interactive pool table or even just non-linear level design (they were more realistic, with multiple paths from one place to the other- the Richard Gray (The Levelord) made a point of having levels that it was difficult to get trapped or cornered in).

Nothing I've played recently- with the possible exception of some levels in Deus Ex 3- has had level design to match it.

DNF was an embarrassment to the masterpiece of a game that was the original Duke3D, even if it was cheesy as hell!

7
0

Filled it in.

After selecting "I did not play", I got a set of questions along the lines of "do you like shooters with puzzle elements / driving sections", etc.

Clicked Next and that was the end of the survey.

I suspect they're only interested in the opinion of people who played it (and hence probably bought it, or were able to play for free) and not the opinion of people who deliberately DID NOT buy it after reading reviews / seeing footage. Which kinda seems contrary to the point. If you bought it, they probably don't care about it because you bought it. If they could work out why people WEREN'T buying it, though, that would be a million times more useful to them.

I didn't buy it because:

1) It was shite, as the article inferred.

2) It was a dull, wishy-washy FPS with no imagination, specifically:

a) linear. TOO MUCH LINEARITY. By far

b) toilet-humour with nothing to back it up with

c) over-use of violence/sex as the reasoning behind a character / image / scene

d) It looked and, from what I saw, played like a shooter from the pre-Duke era with fancier graphics

e) None of the "good" content that's been leaked of previous iterations of DNF were included.

3) It was expensive

Seriously, the title was nothing more than a cash-in on the name. Want to know why it failed? Go look at other FPS and even the original Duke.

And stop being patronising - you really AREN'T interested in why it failed, hence why your survey doesn't even cover the greater proportion of people who you need to capture.

P.S. Think we'll be buying another sequel even if you fix most of the problems? Think again.

8
2

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Apple said to be 'exploring' 5.7-inch iPhone
Who's the copycat this time, Mr. Cook?
Google Chromebooks now in over 6,600 stores
Major, worldwide retail push begins this summer