Feeds

Network interface cards are coming up trumps

How to pick out the aces

Top three mobile application threats

Network interface cards (NICs) are often overlooked in server design. Their sheer ubiquity, combined with the ability to deal with most networking problems in software, can make them a component whose exact specifications are ignored.

Some motherboard integrated NICs offer features such as jumbo frames and TCP offloading.

These reduce network overhead as well as the processing load network access places on a server’s CPUs. Some NICs do not offer these features, while others make the attempt badly, fail miserably and cause no end of frustration.

In a virtualised environment, this sort of crapshoot isn’t acceptable: basic features such as jumbo frames and TCP offloading just have to work.

The real deal

The increased use of storage protocols such as iSCSI and Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) also offers efficiencies to be gained through offloading. Cards supporting these protocols play a critical role in the network-based storage technologies that are becoming commonplace in large data centres.

This is where real NICs come in. Real NICs do all of the above and then start arguing over who supports which sexy new thing.

Consider virtual Ethernet bridging (VEB), which is how a hypervisor's vSwitch allows virtual machines (VMs) to connect to the host’s network. It has also increasingly become a tickbox offload capability for real NICs – a speed boost that is becoming vital for large-scale implementations.

Name game

Virtual networking queuing has its own offload buzzwords. To VMware it is NetQueue, while Microsoft calls it VMQ. Brocade uses the term "virtual machine optimised ports", while Intel chooses virtual machine device queues. Regardless of the terminology, proper NICs can do the offloading.

All this is fairly straightforward. Buy the appropriate NIC, put it into a server, make sure your operating system or hypervisor has the right drivers, and things just get faster.

This is a cute trick but definitely not the star attraction. The power of real NICs comes from their ability to impose network management and visibility upon virtual switching environments.

The reason we go to all the trouble of implementing expensive layer-3 switches with more features than your average automobile is because of the immense control those devices offer over every aspect of networking.

Until recently, the virtual switches inside a hypervisor removed a certain amount of granular control by obfuscating the last layer of switching away from the management software used by the rest of the network.

Enter 802.1Qbg Virtual Ethernet Port Aggregation (VEPA) and 802.1Qbh Bridge Port Extension (often called VN-Tag).

Open contest

Both are competing standards for gaining management control over virtual switching. VN-Tag is backed by Cisco and works by replacing the hypervisor’s vSwitch with a proprietary one that alters Ethernet frames. It isn’t compatible with existing Ethernet anything and you will need special Cisco gear to make it work.

VEPA is the standard backed by pretty much everyone else. Its solution to the management problem is to tell the hypervisor to send all packets out to an external switch for processing.

In the case of VEPA-enabled NICs, that external switch is the network card installed in the virtual server, but it can just as easily be a switch on the other end of a wire.

VEB, VEPA and VN-Tag all fall under the catch-all of Edge Virtual Bridging, the network battle of the moment. Your choice of NIC determines protocol support, and that in turn determines which physical and virtual switches you can use if you want granular visibility of every virtual node on your network.

Open standards are important, but broad vendor implementation is even more so. The role of the humble network card isn’t quite so humble any more. ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
This time it's 'Personal': new Office 365 sub covers just two devices
Redmond also brings Office into Google's back yard
Kingston DataTraveler MicroDuo: Turn your phone into a 72GB beast
USB-usiness in the front, micro-USB party in the back
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Inside the Hekaton: SQL Server 2014's database engine deconstructed
Nadella's database sqares the circle of cheap memory vs speed
BOFH: Oh DO tell us what you think. *CLICK*
$%%&amp Oh dear, we've been cut *CLICK* Well hello *CLICK* You're breaking up...
Just what could be inside Dropbox's new 'Home For Life'?
Biz apps, messaging, photos, email, more storage – sorry, did you think there would be cake?
IT bods: How long does it take YOU to train up on new tech?
I'll leave my arrays to do the hard work, if you don't mind
Amazon reveals its Google-killing 'R3' server instances
A mega-memory instance that never forgets
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Learn about three of the top mobile application security threats facing businesses today and recommendations on how to mitigate the risk.
Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
SANS - Survey on application security programs
In this whitepaper learn about the state of application security programs and practices of 488 surveyed respondents, and discover how mature and effective these programs are.