The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Hunt blasts progress on BT infrastructure-share plans

'You'll let anyone use your pole or answer to me'

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Jeremy Hunt is fed up with BT's slow response to pressure from communications watchdog Ofcom and ISP rivals over the telco giant's pole and duct pricing plans that are expected to be revealed later this month.

In a speech at the Royal Television Society in Cambridge last night, the culture secretary said he was concerned about Blighty lagging behind other countries if the underlying infrastructure isn't rented out by BT at a reasonable cost to other comms providers.

"The process to reach a satisfactory conclusion on PIA [physical infrastructure access] prices for the use of BT’s ducts and poles is taking too long," he said.

"PIA has to be sorted out – and quickly - in a way that allows fair competition with different providers able to invest in our broadband infrastructure. It’s also important that we have a properly competitive market in retail fibre."

Hunt said he would work closely with Ofcom on the matter.

BT blamed its rivals for delaying its PIA pricing announcement, by claiming that some firms were "slow to sign up."

It had initially said that the rental prices for rival telcos to carry their fibre via its PIA would be published in the summer.

The company has been trialling its duct and pole sharing plans with Sky since April this year.

"BT volunteered to open its ducts and poles to other providers last year and we have kept Ofcom fully informed every step of the way," a BT spokesman told The Register.

"As planned, we will issue revised prices for duct and pole access in the coming weeks."

However, any intervention from Ofcom – which has previously warned BT not to set its prices too high – could take between a year and 18 months to work through the system.

BT has previously pointed out that it isn't "dependent on government intervention or regulatory support" – having invested £2.5bn to roll out fibre broadband to two-thirds of the UK by the end of 2015.

Hunt, who has set an ambitious target of gifting the country with the "best superfast broadband network in Europe by 2015", isn't satisfied with the current state of the market and called for greater competition in the sector.

"We need to ensure we do not make the same mistake in broadband that we made in railways - building our high speed network 45 years after the French and 62 years after the Japanese," he said.

Hunt is hoping to give every home and business in the UK access to connection speeds of at least 2Mbit/s by 2015. The government has so far allocated most of its £530m fund to local authorities as part of those upgrade plans.

He confirmed yesterday that Suffolk was given £11.68m from the BDUK pot, while Rutland got £700,000. That work is now being put out to tender, with successful bidders expected to match the government's investment.

During his speech, Hunt added that mobile phone operators needed to stop bickering over Ofcom's coming 4G spectrum auction statement expected this autumn.

"The volume of mobile internet data is tripling every year, and we expect it to increase 26 fold by 2015. We must assume that whether at home or on the move, the devices people use to access the internet will be mobile from now on," said the secretary of state.

He singled out other European countries, such as Sweden and Germany, that had already completed their auctions.

"Mobile phone operators must put aside competitive differences and work together in their common – and our national - interest to make this happen." ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Ah...

"Mobile phone operators must put aside competitive differences and work together in their common – and our national - interest to make this happen."

Well, good luck with that.

4
0

why?

Why does BT still control the infrastructure? I guess its because their whopping pension deficit is covered by the UK Govt......

2
0
Anonymous Coward

Err...

BT Still controls the infrastructure because the previous tory government separated them from the post office and sold them off (to the people who already owned them.) They then put in place regulation which basically prevented BT from competing, until the other telcos had time to catch up with putting in their own infrastructure. The other telcos, with the exception of the local cablecos, did sod all for anything except backbone/trunk links, because that was where the money was. When ADSL came along, they all stated bitching that it wasn't fair that they didn't have the last mile and that BT should let them use their last mile.

Now personally, I think that physical national infrastructure such as trains, electricity, water, gas, telecomms from the exchange , etc, etc, etc should belong to the state, but what do I know...

1
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?
 breaking news
 breaking news
SEXY models clash at big bash over catty tweets: Yup, it's HTC v Samsung
Tech titan twits taunt: Doncha wish your mobe was hot like me?