Feeds

Overland Storage preps private cloud rescue

Oh my white fluffy knight, take me away from all this

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

Troubled tape and disk storage vendor Overland Storage has seen revenues drop and losses rise over its last fiscal year, but fared better in its final quarter. A clustered filer product and private cloud offering is coming, hopefully lifting Overland out of the prolonged hole it has been in.

The fourth quarter (Q4 2011), ending on 30 June, saw revenues of $17.6m, down from the $19.3m recorded in Q4 2010, with net losses also down from the Q4 2010 figure of $9.7m at $9.2m. Encouragingly, gross margin – which was 29.3 percent in the year-ago quarter – was 32.5 per cent in Q4 2011.

The full year FY11 figures masked this, with revenues of $70.2m, $7.5m lower than fiscal 2010 revenues of $77.7m. The net loss in 2010 was $13m and this increased to $14.5m in 2011. The gross margin for 2010 was 27.7 per cent and this increased to 30.2 per cent in 2011, with three consecutive quarters of over 30 per cent gross margins. SnapServer and SnapSAN disk-based product revenue grew 32.7 per cent year-over-year. So it was not all bad news, numerically speaking.

But, obviously, the few examples of product sales growth, the margin increases and operating expense reductions weren't enough, necessary, vital even, but far from enough.

Basically Overland stuck to its hard road in 2011, salami-slicing its costs down, building up its channel – there are now more than 1,500 resellers worldwide - buying NAS clustering assets from the failed MaxiScale; entering new vertical marketing segments; and developing new product technology. BlueArc and Drobo founder Geoff Barrall is running the product engineering and development factory, so to speak, otherwise known as the rescue department.

That's the hope, the prayer: that Barrall's vision and drive will pluck a technology rabbit out of Overland's development hat to rescue the company.

One other potential lift to revenues could come from the patent infringement lawsuit against German autoloader supplier BDT, IBM and Dell. That could help sweeten the bitter pill of losing the tape library OEM deal with HP, a contract which finally came to an end in the fourth quarter.

Overland said this about the lawsuit: "An International Trade Commission (ITC) trial was completed on September 7, 2011, with a ruling from the ITC expected by November 23, 2011. We are represented by DLA Piper LLP, the largest law firm in the world. We were pleased with the development of the evidence at the trial and we remain optimistic about the case."

It could lose though, as such lawsuits are a bit of a lottery.

CEO Eric Kelly mentioned forthcoming products in his earnings remarks: "In fiscal 2012, we expect to release a clustered NAS solution and a private cloud offering designed to enable our entry into additional fast growing markets."

That's more like it.

The company said this would enable it "to bridge the gap between traditional disk storage and cloud storage solutions, which would enable data storage infrastructures to scale extensively without sacrificing reliability and performance". The new products will use the MaxiScale technology and Overland's Snap Guardian operating system.

A manufacturing partner was selected for the forthcoming disk products, note the plural, in Q4, and the release referred to a "new Snap platform".

Eric Kelly said: "With the selection of our strategic manufacturing and materials partners, and the next-generation design and architecture of our new product offerings, we plan to deliver a new level of functionality, performance and pricing to address the requirements of the distributed enterprise and the small and medium enterprise customers." Ah, every Overland customer, channel partner and investor has been waiting for this.

They can look forward to improved Snap Appliance products, a clustered NAS product and a private cloud offering in fiscal 2012 – that is by 30 June, 2012.

Overland employees, its channel partners, investors and customers could perhaps begin to hope that the company might move into profit in a late 2012 quarter. That would be a long, long-awaited event and everyone involved would be over the moon.

Let's not go over the top though. Put hope to one side. The company still has a lot of hard grinding to do and there are no guarantees about the eventual outcome. ®

Beginner's guide to SSL certificates

More from The Register

next story
It's Big, it's Blue... it's simply FABLESS! IBM's chip-free future
Or why the reversal of globalisation ain't gonna 'appen
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
Microsoft and Dell’s cloud in a box: Instant Azure for the data centre
A less painful way to run Microsoft’s private cloud
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
CAGE MATCH: Microsoft, Dell open co-located bit barns in Oz
Whole new species of XaaS spawning in the antipodes
AWS pulls desktop-as-a-service from the PC
Support for PCoIP protocol means zero clients can run cloudy desktops
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.