Feeds

Mobile gains fail to offset Optus profit dip

Readies for competition

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Mobile competition is set to intensify in the year ahead with renewed network investment and significant discounting across the market, claimed Optus chief executive, Paul O'Sullivan.

Optus posted a 5 percent fall in quarterly profit, while its mobile revenue rose 5 percent in the quarter to $AU1.49 billion.

Revenue across business and wholesale, and consumer and SMB segments remained stable. EBITDA was up 1 percent to $AU560 million, driven by contribution from all segments and continuing cost management. Underlying net profit grew 3 percent to $AU174 million, excluding the impact of workforce restructuring.

“Against the backdrop of a highly competitive Australian telecommunications market with competitors discounting prices and sacrificing profits, Optus delivered resilient results,” O'Sullivan said.

Strong postpaid customer growth drove mobile activity, with 113,000 postpaid net additions this quarter. The number of 3G customers increased to 5.29 million, up 4 percent from the last quarter. O'Sullivan warned that mobile would see an increased tussle for the consumer.

"When your main competitor takes a billion dollars off their bottom line and then gives guidance that says they are not going to try to recover that, then that tells you it is going to be very competitive," he said.

Adding that when a smaller competitor is offering $AU45 infinite plans, “then that is also going to make sure it is a very competitive market.” O’Sullivan forecast that further growth would come from digital service innovations.

Optus’s ramp up of digital services and products include the launch last month of Optus TV Now, enabling customers to schedule, record and playback any of the 15 free-to-air television channels from their compatible 3G mobile devices or PC.

As part of its strategy to develop a suite of converged video services, Optus also announced plans to sell the Fetch TV supported IPTV service accessible across multiple devices, scheduled for launch in the second half of 2011.

Meanwhile, the profits of Optus parent, Singapore Telecommunications, fell by 3 percent, mainly due to the poor performance of its Indian operations. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Big Content outs piracy hotbeds: São Paulo, Beijing ... TORONTO?
MPAA calls Canadians a bunch of bootlegging movie thieves
Google Glassholes are UNDATEABLE – HP exec
You need an emotional connection, says touchy-feely MD... We can do that
Lawyers mobilise angry mob against Apple over alleged 2011 Macbook Pro crapness
We suffered 'random bouts of graphical distortion' - fanbois
Just don't blame Bono! Apple iTunes music sales PLUMMET
Cupertino revenue hit by cheapo downloads, says report
US court SHUTS DOWN 'scammers posing as Microsoft, Facebook support staff'
Netizens allegedly duped into paying for bogus tech advice
Feds seek potential 'second Snowden' gov doc leaker – report
Hang on, Ed wasn't here when we compiled THIS document
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.