Feeds

Bankers plot telco bypass for payments

Tight margins not to be shared with operators

Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile

The Payments Council has been explaining its plans for a mobile payment platform: one that doesn't leave a cut for the network operators but keeps the revenue for the bankers.

The council's head of innovation has been talking to NFC World about how the platform will work, and being quite explicit that telcos won't be invited to share the cake.

The organisation, which counts all the significant UK banks in its membership, is putting a tender together for the development of a standard backend architecture to handle payments made on mobile phones, regardless of the handset technology used.

"Some may go for NFC, and some may use browser-based systems or SMS methods, it's up to them", Richard Martin of the Payments Council told NFC World, but he also explained that operators shouldn't expect to make any revenue from the wallet replacements:

"I wouldn't say the new platform will necessarily cut mobile operators out of payment services ... [but it's] not something that telcos have traditionally been set up to work around."

Martin doesn't dismiss revenue opportunities for telcos, suggesting that they might gain from additional data usage, but fortunately the UK's network operators already have a plan in place to make money from NFC without taking a cut of every payment.

That plan involves creating a standard advertising platform, enabling an advertiser to sign a single deal to provide an NFC application (such as a loyalty or identity card) which will be usable by customers of any network operator – except Three, which was inexplicably left out of the deal.

Elsewhere in the world, operators are still hoping to make money by charging payment services for space in their NFC handsets, or by running their own payment systems and taking a cut of every transaction, but in the UK it seems banks will make money from money while operators will make money from advertising, and consumers just have to get used to it. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
'Cowardly, venomous trolls' threatened with TWO-YEAR sentences for menacing posts
UK government: 'Taking a stand against a baying cyber-mob'
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.