Feeds

Virgin Media sees 36,000 cable customers scarper in Q2

That's OK, they were only 'low-value' rabble

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Virgin Media lost 36,000 customers in the three months ended 30 June, but the ISP isn't that bothered about what it described as "lower-value single and dual-play" punters.

The company claimed it was happy to shed such customers in favour of tailoring "superior services" to those willing to shell out more cash in return.

"The value and mix of our customer base continues to improve as we focus on growing triple and quad-play penetration and improving the proportion of customers on higher tiers of services," said Virgin Media in its second quarter results.

"The number of triple and quad-play customers has increased by 2.6 per cent in the last 12 months, whilst the number of single and dual-play customers has decreased by 3.5 per cent over the same period."

The telco's total customer base now stands at 4.78 million, of which around 63 per cent of people on Virgin Media's books pay for three services.

That's slightly down on the company's Q1 results, when it reported a total customer base of 4.8 million.

Its Q2 revenue grew to £985.8m compared with the same period a year earlier, when it reported sales of £964.2m. Virgin Media delivered operating income of £134.9m, up on 2010's Q2 figure of £79.6m.

The firm added that its average revenue per cable user had climbed 3 per cent to £47.35 per month, which somewhat helped offset customers who altogether abandoned the ISP.

"During the first half, we have continued to focus relentlessly on delivering superior services tailored to the needs of these data-hungry households and businesses," said Virgin Media boss Neil Berkett.

"The increasing demand is evident in a 25 per cent increase in data consumption among Virgin Media s customers in just six months who have watched and downloaded more content then ever before.

"This trend is rapidly transforming the profile of our subscriber base, with more than half of all new broadband customers choosing 30Mbit/s or higher compared to just 18 per cent a year ago."

The company also announced a hefty £850m share buyback and debt repayment scheme to take the total amount of stock repurchased since mid 2010 to £1bn.

Shares in Virgin Media are currently trading down 3 per cent on the London Stock Exchange. ®

The essential guide to IT transformation

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
Time Warner Cable customers SQUEAL as US network goes offline
A rude awakening: North Americans greeted with outage drama
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
Netflix swallows yet another bitter pill, inks peering deal with TWC
Net neutrality crusader once again pays up for priority access
EE plonks 4G in UK Prime Minister's backyard
OK, his constituency. Brace yourself for EXTRA #selfies
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.