Feeds

Intel reports (mostly) solid revenue growth

Double digits across all segments – except Atom

Security for virtualized datacentres

Intel's second quarter of 2011 was a good one, beating Wall Street estimates and showing double-digit revenue growth across all major business segments. But weakness at the low end of the market shows that the world's largest microprocessor maker has its vulnerabilities.

"We achieved a significant new milestone in the second quarter, surpassing $13.0 billion in revenue for the first time," said Intel headman Paul Otellini in a prepared statement. The consensus on the Street, according to FactSet Research, was that the company would pull in $12.8bn during the quarter.

When measured using generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) metrics, that $13bn revenue was up $2.3 billion from the same quarter last year, a rise of 21 per cent. Net income, however, was up a much smaller amount: at $3bn, it rose a mere $67m, a 2 per cent year-on-year bump.

Non-GAAP figures were higher in each case – especially net income, which grew by 10 per cent to $3.2bn, a rise of $290m, when those pesky generally accepted principles were laid aside.

Each of Intel's three major business groups saw solid revenue growth: the PC Client Group was up 11 per cent year-on-year, the Data Center Group up 15 per cent, and the catch-all Other Intel Architecture Group was up 84 per cent.

News was not rosy in all the subgroups, however. Atom processor and chipset revenue was down 15 per cent to $352 million, likely due at least in part to the netbook-cannibalization effect of Apple's iPads – oh, and maybe some other tablets, as well. Possibly.

Otellini credited the generally peachy results to "strong corporate demand for our most advanced technology, the surge of mobile devices and internet traffic fueling data center growth, and the rapid rise of computing in emerging markets."

You'll notice that his reference to the rise of mobile devices as a contibuting factor to Intel's healthy quarter spoke only of their influence on data center expansion, and not on sales of his company's low-power microprocessors. Intel still has its work cut out for it in that segment before it can realistically attempt to pry a chunk of that rapidly expanding market away from the increasingly strong grip of ARM. ®

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.