Feeds

Medvet board to investigate privacy breach

More faces meet palms in South Australia

  • alert
  • submit to reddit

Remote control for virtualized desktops

Medvet, the paternity-and-drug-testing laboratory owned by the South Australian Government that allowed Google to index its customer records until last weekend, says it will investigate how the breach occurred.

According to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation’s PM radio programme on Monday evening, the breach affected more than 800 individuals who had placed online orders with the company.

The Australian, which broke the story on Saturday (July 16) has also said that the privacy breach, known to the company since April, wasn’t reported to the South Australian government until the weekend, even though a Health Department manager sits on the company’s board.

Speaking to PM, Medvet CEO David Swan said “it appears that there’s been some issue … that’s occurred with the software between Google and some software that’s being used by the company to register requests for drug tests.”

Swan said the company has requested its board to conduct “an independent investigation both from a forensic IT perspective but also from the events which have led up to this”.

What appears to be inadequate communication between the Medvet board and its owner, the South Australian Government, seems surprising considering that a sale of the company had been http://www.health.sa.gov.au/Default.aspx?tabid=792 proposed in the 2010-2011 state budget.

The government’s public budget papers didn’t put a valuation on Medvet, but a copy of internal budget documents leaked on a USB key to the ABC last year put a valuation of AU$15 million on the company.

The Australian Privacy Foundation’s health chair Juanita Fernando told PM that litigation is inevitable following the Medvet breach. ®

Bootnote: This author was taken to task yesterday for over-emphasising the role of robots.txt. That’s a fair cop: but protecting sensitive information should be part of Web 101 for an organization such as Medvet. Public humiliation should be the least of the punishments. ®

Remote control for virtualized desktops

More from The Register

next story
'Regin': The 'New Stuxnet' spook-grade SOFTWARE WEAPON described
'A degree of technical competence rarely seen'
You really need to do some tech support for Aunty Agnes
Free anti-virus software, expires, stops updating and p0wns the world
You stupid BRICK! PCs running Avast AV can't handle Windows fixes
Fix issued, fingers pointed, forums in flames
Privacy bods offer GOV SPY VICTIMS a FREE SPYWARE SNIFFER
Looks for gov malware that evades most antivirus
Patch NOW! Microsoft slings emergency bug fix at Windows admins
Vulnerability promotes lusers to domain overlords ... oops
HACKERS can DELETE SURVEILLANCE DVRS remotely – report
Hikvision devices wide open to hacking, claim securobods
prev story

Whitepapers

Why cloud backup?
Combining the latest advancements in disk-based backup with secure, integrated, cloud technologies offer organizations fast and assured recovery of their critical enterprise data.
Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
How to determine if cloud backup is right for your servers
Two key factors, technical feasibility and TCO economics, that backup and IT operations managers should consider when assessing cloud backup.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
The Heartbleed Bug: how to protect your business with Symantec
What happens when the next Heartbleed (or worse) comes along, and what can you do to weather another chapter in an all-too-familiar string of debilitating attacks?