Feeds

Apple snuffs iPhone privacy complaint with Korean peanuts

Sueapple.co.kr

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Updated Apple has paid a South Korean user one million won to settle a complaint arising from unauthorized iPhone collection of that user's location information.

This is the first time the Cupertino outfit has made such a payout.

Although the amount involved is miniscule – ₩1m converts to just under $950 – what's important is the fact that Apple knuckled under* to a court's May decision to pay the settlement, coupled with the determination of the legal counsel involved to press forward with a class action suit.

And then there's the fact that Apple is currently embroiled in another far more financially significant patent-infringement battle with the South Korean manufacturer Samsung.

Korean website 'Sueapple' solicits parties for class-action lawsuit

William Tell meets Poppin' Fresh in South Korea

According to a Reuters report, Apple paid the fine last month. That payment, however, didn't stop the law firm representing the wronged user – Kim Hyung-suk, also a lawyer – from launching a website, Sueapple, soliciting other Korean iPhone users to join in a lawsuit over the iPhone data-collection imbroglio, which was ameliorated with what Apple characterized as a "bug fix" in May.

Apple currently faces at least three such cases in the US, and a lawyer representing one of them – Ajjampur et al v. Apple, Inc. – recently wrote to his presiding judge that he was "on notice that another lawyer intends to file additional copycat suits, I believe in state courts, in about thirty states."

It remains to be seen whether any Korean class action lawsuit might result in billions of won – not a mere ₩1m – being extracted from Cupertino. It would also be interesting to see if a public legal tussle might influence the climate surrounding the ongoing wrangling between Apple and Samsung.

The basics of that battle: Apple sued Samsung in April, alleging that the Korean smartphone maker's Galaxy line of Android phone ripped off Apple look-and-feel. Samsung quickly retaliated on more-technical grounds, then petitioned the US International Trade Commission to prevent Apple from importing devices into the US – and Apple quickly followed suit. No pun intended.

In its most-recent earnings statement, Apple noted that it had "experienced particularly strong year-over-year net sales growth" in Korea. If might be worth billions of won in privacy payouts for Apple to burnish its public image in that country as an aid to maintaining that lucrative position. ®

* Update

A Reg reader notes that Apple did not voluntarily pay the court-ordered fee, citing a Korea Times article that says, in part:

Apple Korea did not respond to the ruling. Following the decision, Apple Korea had refused to pay compensation. The court seized 1 million won from Apple Korea's bank account for payment of compensation to the complainant after deducting 2,000 won in remittance fees.

Our thanks to Mr Bean for the clarification.

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
WHY did Sunday Mirror stoop to slurping selfies for smut sting?
Tabloid splashes, MP resigns - but there's a BIG copyright issue here
Spies, avert eyes! Tim Berners-Lee demands a UK digital bill of rights
Lobbies tetchy MPs 'to end indiscriminate online surveillance'
How the FLAC do I tell MP3s from lossless audio?
Can you hear the difference? Can anyone?
Inequality increasing? BOLLOCKS! You heard me: 'Screw the 1%'
There's morality and then there's economics ...
Google hits back at 'Dear Rupert' over search dominance claims
Choc Factory sniffs: 'We're not pirate-lovers - also, you publish The Sun'
EU to accuse Ireland of giving Apple an overly peachy tax deal – report
Probe expected to say single-digit rate was unlawful
While you queued for an iPhone 6, Apple's Cook sold shares worth $35m
Right before the stock took a 3.8% dive amid bent and broken mobe drama
prev story

Whitepapers

A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Beginner's guide to SSL certificates
De-mystify the technology involved and give you the information you need to make the best decision when considering your online security options.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.