Cleaning up the Bitcoin act
Camp BX live with high-sec trading platform
Believers are reluctant to moderate their hype; regulators and lawmakers want to either shut the whole thing down, or at least tax it; and hackers still see it as an attractive target.
Camp BX, a new exchange launched last week, hopes to address at least some of the problems. Could a combination of security and legitimacy solve Bitcoin’s problems? The Register spoke to Keyur Mithawala of Camp BX – and naturally enough, the conversation started around security.
“Although it looks like a hobby project, Mt Gox was already processing around US$324 million worth of Bitcoin transactions per year when you’re dealing with millions of Bitcoins, security has to be the core concern,” Mithawala said.
“I have worked for telecoms and finance companies, so I came at this from a corporate standpoint. You might not get a chance to rebuild if your security is compromised.”
Physical security is addressed by hosting the exchange in a secure data centre with three carrier connections.
The most-promoted aspect of platform security is the Camp BX association with McAfee, which runs “12,000 to 13,000 scripted tests” against the site each night, Mithawala said.
As well, the Bitcoin Consultancy in the UK conducts penetration tests against the platform, and Mithawala says that internally, the organization uses a peer-review mechanism to try and avoid all code vulnerabilities.
However, as recent events have illustrated, technical security isn’t the only challenge facing exchanges. The volatility of the currency itself is also a problem.
Mithawala says this price volatility illustrates a gap in Bitcoin’s design. “A core thing that’s missing in all the exchanges is that there is no functionality for short selling.”
While short-selling got a bad reputation in the global financial crisis, it’s still an important market mechanism, he believes, one which would help reduce the range of prices – and therefore the volatility – of Bitcoin prices.
“If someone believes Bicoin prices should be lower at a particular point in time, they should have that option.”
Bitcoin’s “one-sided” price pressure makes the currency vulnerable to “flash crashes”, he believes, leading to variations that can be as much as “hundreds of percentage points in a month.”
This volatility drives Bitcoin towards purely speculative exchanges, he told The Register. “If prices can stabilize, that’s when the Bitcoin economy will really take off.”
Liquidity is also a problem in the world of Bitcoin exchanges. If you’re unfamiliar with the scale of the “real” economy, US300 million or so in trades each year sounds like a lot; but as Mithawala points out, the world of foreign exchange deals in trillions.
Bitcoin’s small size – and consequent low liquidity – creates two problems. The first is that large trades can exceed the liquidity of the exchange, which creates the second problem, that an individual with large holdings can use large trades to manipulate prices.
“We believe we can stabilize prices if Camp BX is processing around 20 percent of total volume,” Mithawala said.
There is a lot of uncertainty over the legality of Bitcoins in America, he said: money laundering laws, trading laws, and currency laws all impact on whether or not Bitcoins can be regarded as completely legal.
“We decided to do this project legally,” Mithawala said. To that end, he said, Camp BX consulted with a host of regulators, including the Department of Treasury and the Department of Banking and Finance, as well as state regulators.
“Our assessment is that Bitcoin can’t be banned outright – it would be like outlawing mathematics. If it can comply, then it can be legal. We don’t want Bitcoins to be underground and illegal.”
Mithawala says Camp BX will stay in touch with regulators about its operations.
Transparency is also important, Mithawala believes, and in a way this looks paradoxical, given that one of the attractions of Bitcoin is supposed to be anonymity.
However, users aren’t the same as exchanges. Mithawala said an exchange has to be transparent, visible and credible: it has to be backed by people you can name and phone numbers you can call.
“For example, Tradehill is the number two exchange right now. If you want to transact, then you put your money into a personal bank account in New Jersey.”
Not only does this look risky from outside, he said it arguably violates foreign exchange laws.
“We are offering clear processes of how we do the money transfer, who to contact, and we provide all the information that users will need to have confidence in us,” he told The Register.
Author’s note: I can’t tell you whether Camp BX will work or not. I’m certain there are questions I neglected to ask – and I’m also certain that El Reg readers will think of them.
One problem is that Camp BX's attention is on US regulation, and Bitcoin is international. Will this disadvantage users in other countries?
Possibly the greatest challenge for Camp BX will be in asking Bitcoin users to swap some of their freewheeling anarchy for a secure and transparent exchange. ®
Can I just take this opportunity to ask "what is the point of bitcoin?"
It it's anonymity that surely that will all be lost once regulation comes along. Without regulation the legality is questionable which then raises questions of genuine value. It also opens up the potential for systemic abuse and market manipulation. I think I'll stick with the real stuff.
Still not convinced
Lots of people "have been in contact with regulators" regarding approval of Bitcoin, but none of them tell us what those regulators say.
European Regulators will tell them they have to register as an electronic money issuer in the same way that Paypal is, have €1m of money in reserve, and in addition, have reserves equal to the amount of money outstanding.
When I've suggested that before, people say that Bitcoin is completely different to Paypal or the various prepaid credit cards out there, and the regulations cannot possibly apply to Bitcoin. Actually, Bitcoin is exactly like how electronic money was originally envisaged. The regulations were extended to allow "server based" systems to operate as well, and server based systems are now the only type that actually exists.
In the US, Paypal is registered in each state as a money transmission agent. Presumably the requirements are a bit different in each one, but I doubt very much that Bitcoin meets those requirements.
Look at MTGox for example. There is $27m going into their exchange every month, but the withdrawal limits of $1000 per user per day means there almost certainly isn't that amount of money coming out of the exchange. Are they registered with the Japanese financial regulator to hold client money? Do they capital adequacy returns that are subject to regular audit? Yes you can point to Madoff and say that these don't always work, but that doesn't mean you solve the problem by getting rid of these regulations altogether like in the days of Charles Ponzi.
The Bitcoin rent-a-crowd will of course be along shortly to tell me how wrong I am, and to vote me down, as they always do, but I still maintain that Bitcoin is a cross between a speculative bubble and a Ponzi scheme. In the future, people will read about this in their history books and wonder how anyone could possibly be stupid enough to be taken in by it. I want to put it very clearly in the public record now that I was not taken in.
We don’t want Bitcoins to be underground and illegal.
Then expect to be assessed for tax.
And then expect to lose about half your users that are crazy libertarian types and consider tax to be immoral and an affront to their absolute ideas of freedom.