The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

NetApp patents Hybrid Aggregates, sneers at PCIe

Flash cutlery alongside the platter

SaaS data loss: The problem you didn’t know you had

NetApp has Hybrid Aggregate drives coming, with data moved automatically in real time between flash located next to the spinning disks. The company now says that this is a better technology than PCIe flash approaches.

NetApp, presenting at an Analyst Day event in New York on 30 June, said that having networked storage move as it were into the host server environment was disadvantageous. This was according to Stifel Nicolaus analyst Aaron Rakers. Manish Goel, NetApp's product ops EVP, said SSDs used as hard disk drive replacements were not as interesting as using flash at the disk layer in a Hybrid Aggregate drive approach – and this was coming.

Flash Cache in the controller is a straightforward array read I/O accelerator. PCIe flash in host servers is a complementary technology but will not decentralise the storage market and move networked storage back into the host servers.

NetApp has a patent in this Hybrid Aggregate disk drive area called "Mechanisms for moving data in a Hybrid Aggregate".

The abstract, in that convoluted intricate language and dense paragraphing patent people use, says:

At least certain embodiments disclose a method, system and apparatus for relocating data between tiers of storage media in a hybrid storage aggregate encompassing multiple tiers of heterogeneous physical storage media including a file system to automatically relocate the data between tiers.

The hybrid storage aggregate includes one or more volumes, each volume including a volume block number space spanning at least a first-tier of storage media and a second tier of storage media of the multiple tiers of heterogeneous physical storage media and the hybrid storage aggregate further includes a control module to cooperatively manage the tiers of the multiple tiers of heterogeneous physical storage media and a file system coupled with the control module, the file system including a policy module configured to make policy decisions based on a set of one or more policies and configured to automatically relocate data between different tiers of the multiple tiers of heterogeneous physical storage media based on the set of policies."

Here's a diagram of the set-up:

Hybrid Aggregate sketch

Hybrid Aggregate sketch

This patent envisages an: "electronic storage medium [which] comprises a solid-state device (SSD) and the magnetic storage medium [also] comprises a hard disk device (HDD)."

A Hybrid Aggregate is defined as "A logical aggregation of heterogeneous physical storage [ie, a logical container for a pool of storage combining one or more physical mass storage devices of different storage media technologies or parts thereof into a single logical storage object], which contains or provides storage for one or more other logical datasets."

Surely this is what we all understand as auto-placement of data in a virtual storage pool comprising SSD and fast disk tiers, such as Compellent's block-level Data Progression? Not so, according to a person close to the situation: "It's much more automatic, real-time and granular. Compellent needs policies and is not real-time. [NetApp] will be automatic and always move data real-time, rather than retroactively."

ONTAP 8.1

NetApp also confirmed it would release ONTAP 8.1 in the autumn. It will focus on scaling out unified storage from both a capacity perspective and a workload perspective. The company said scale-out NAS – such as Isilon as we understand it – is tuned to specific workloads, whereas scaling out its FAS block-and-file access storage is more general in applicability.

Hybrid Aggregates won't be in 8.1 but will appear in a follow-on release.

The company also said it would focus on partnering for better service automation and integration. ®

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

Latest Comments

Apple Tarts and Blueberry Pie

Aggregates are not LUNS. Aggregates are storage pools. They may contain many volumes, each of which may or may not be a LUN.

Having said that, I agree that this feature is already available from all vendors I'm aware of.

0
0

Cache needs to be closer to the server to be efficient

If your disk has 5ms latency and array/network has 1ms, you see 6ms of latency from the server. Let's say some amount of flash will give you a 80% hit rate, with 10 microsecond latency.

If you place the cache near to the disks, you get 2 ms average latency from server.

If you place the cache on PCI-e on server you now see 1.2 ms latency, and you alleviate 80% of the traffic on the array on a read workload, so you end up also saving on array iron.

0
0

NetApp's innovation and others acquisition

Feels better when some company works to innovate. Good job NetApp!

When was the last time the storage leader innovate something special? The great Moshe era.

After that it has been a copy paste of the same code or acquire. But Bezel keep changing with a V in the front. Hopefully NetApp 8.1 does something disruptive. 8.0 version was not impressive.

Unified scale-out will make EMC acquire something new or make Isilon support FCSAN.

0
0

More from The Register

SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
You don't need phone lines or cable for ANYTHING, says Dish
The satellite-dish man can sort you out with phone and broadband over the air too
 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches