Feeds

Technology investors urge US politicians to reject web-blocking law

Tech backers say proposed copyright protection law will 'chill investment'

Securing Web Applications Made Simple and Scalable

A proposed US law that would block access to websites that host copyright-infringing material would "throttle innovation and hurt American competitiveness", a group of technology investors has told US legislators.

US Congress members should reject the proposed new law, the proposed Protect IP Act (PIPA), the investors said in an open letter to members of the US Congress.

One measure called for in the proposed new law is the creation of a blacklist of copyright-infringing websites. PIPA also proposes to give the US Department of Justice the authority to seek court orders that would compel search engines, advertising firms and domain name system providers, among others, to block access to the rogue sites.

The 55 investors and venture capitalists behind the letter include Netscape founder Marc Andreessen, former ICANN chair Esther Dyson and LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman.

"Congress should not chill investment and reduce incentives to work on private sector solutions," the investors' open letter said.

"Instead, we encourage Congress to focus on making it easier to license works and bring new, innovative services to market," the letter said.

The investors said that existing copyright laws under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) already provide the measures needed to combat online copyright infringement.

DMCA guidelines meant internet providers had legal certainty over when they were responsible for taking down infringing material and meant they could not be responsible for the acts of users, but said the Act also gave copyright authors the right to have illegally reproduced material removed.

"We appreciate PIPA's goal of combating sites truly dedicated to infringing activity, but it would undermine the delicate balance of the DMCA and threaten legitimate innovation," the investors said.

The DMCA does not allow US internet providers to block illegally reproduced material on overseas sites and has led US film and music industry bodies to back the censorship measures provided for by PIPA.

"We can't keep being asked to choose between technology and creativity, and we can't stand by as criminals profit from the hard work of the millions of American men and women of the creative and entertainment industry," Michael O'Leary, the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) executive vice president of government affairs said, according to a report in CNET.

"This is a smart, narrowly crafted bill whose purpose is stopping theft, not slowing innovation. All we're asking is that the innovators play by the rules," O'Leary said, according to the report.

But in their open letter to Congress, the group of 55 investors said the new law would place burdens on "countless" services that would have to remove content and said it "endangers the security and integrity of the internet" by requiring domain name system providers to block sites.

The investors also raised concerns about the cost companies could face in adhering to the "significant" scope of court orders and in counteracting legal bids to remove content.

US innovators and investors will be clearly disadvantaged in the global market, the investors said. Copyright infringing works will continue to be loaded outside the reach of US law and help generate traffic to competing foreign services, the investors said.

If enacted the new law would also give other countries the chance to exclude US companies from competing in foreign markets, the investors said.

"PIPA creates a dangerous precedent and a convenient excuse for countries to engage in protectionism and censorship against U.S. services," the investors said in their open letter to US Congress members.

"These countries will point to PIPA as precedent for taking action against US technology and internet companies," the letter said.

The investors said rights-holders should look at new ways of "financing, distributing and profiting from copyrighted material" and advised them to make their material available on new systems online.

Copyright © 2011, OUT-LAW.com

OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Application security programs and practises

More from The Register

next story
ONE EMAIL costs mining company $300 MEEELION
Environmental activist walks free after hoax sent share price over a cliff
Arrr: Freetard-bothering Digital Economy Act tied up, thrown in the hold
Ministry of Fun confirms: Yes, we're busy doing nothing
Help yourself to anyone's photos FOR FREE, suggests UK.gov
Copyright law reforms will keep m'learned friends busy
Apple smacked with privacy sueball over Location Services
Class action launched on behalf of 100 million iPhone owners
US judge: YES, cops or feds so can slurp an ENTIRE Gmail account
Crooks don't have folders labelled 'drug records', opines NY beak
UK government officially adopts Open Document Format
Microsoft insurgency fails, earns snarky remark from UK digital services head
You! Pirate! Stop pirating, or we shall admonish you politely. Repeatedly, if necessary
And we shall go about telling people you smell. No, not really
prev story

Whitepapers

Top three mobile application threats
Prevent sensitive data leakage over insecure channels or stolen mobile devices.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Designing a Defense for Mobile Applications
Learn about the various considerations for defending mobile applications - from the application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.