The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Aussie censor bans Dead or Alive

So not PG … backflips after pressure

Cloud based data management

The Australian classification board has bowed to pressure over the rating of Nintendo 3DS title Dead or Alive: Dimensions, revoking its initial PG certificate and banning it from sale in Australia.

The incident has again tested Australia's limited classification board system which currently holds MA 15+ as its highest classification for video games. The government is considering the introduction of an R18+ rating.

In this case the board said it wrongly awarded Dead or Alive: Dimensions the tame PG rating because it had not been given full information at the time of classification.

“Information provided to the board last week suggested that the game contained content not drawn to the board’s attention in the original classification application,” a spokesperson for the board told the press.

Economic with the truth

The game's distributor, THQ, had submitted the game without publishing the ages of the characters, who are portrayed as younger than 18.

The core issue with the game is its ‘Figure’ mode, which allows players to take 3D views and photographs of the characters from any angle, including up their very short skirts.

Dead Or Alive: Dimensions is now deemed unclassified and cannot be sold in Australia unless resubmitted for classification.

The game has already been pulled from sale in Sweden due to fears that it may violate child pornography laws. It has also been restricted from sale in Denmark and Norway.

Gaming retailers were told to remove the game from Australian shelves on Friday and Nintendo is understood to have already resubmitted the game for classification, hoping to receive an MA15+ rating. Sources suggest this is highly unlikely. ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Wrong direction

They should spend their time trying to protect real children rather than animated characters.

4
0

Title

>who are portrayed as younger than 18<

They should have shown the porn disclaimer, 'all virtual characters over 18, virtual birth certificates on file'.

FFS!

3
0

WTF?

OK, I know our censorship system is screwed up, but beause OFLC cocked up, retailers have to pay staff to remove it from shelves, the publisher can't sell it, AND the publisher gets to re-submit it?

Surely OFLC should be re-issuing the classification automatically and as a matter of priority given this is more or less their own fault... Do warranty laws cover government processes?

2
0

More from The Register

Samsung Galaxy Note 8: Proof the pen is mightier?
Sammy’s iPad Mini killer has a stylus to stab other rivals too
Microsoft lures buy-curious vixens, corduroys with a cheap fondle
Surface slab sales latest: Will no one rid Ballmer of these turbulent tabs?
First look: iOS 7 for iPad
No, Apple hasn't released it yet, but that doesn't stop intrepid devs
 breaking news
Curtain drops on Apple Store ahead of WWDC: What lies behind?
Steve Jobs watching from on high. No pressure, lads
 breaking news
Cold, dead hands of Steve Jobs slip from iPhones: The Cult of Ive is upon us
Billionaire biz baron's death clears way for uber-shiny iOS 7
Airbus imagines suitcases that find themselves
Point your mobe at your smalls to track their every move
Surprise! Intel smartphone trounces ARM in power trials
Tests show equal performance while sipping significantly less juice
Samsung plans LTE Advanced version of Galaxy S4
1Gbps download capability could stiffen drooping S4 sales forecasts
Ex-HTC execs launch UK-based smartphone maker Kazam
Startup threatens to 'disrupt status quo' this year