Feeds

Go Daddy to sell .xxx domains

Jumps on bandwagon straight to hell

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

Go Daddy, the largest seller of internet domain names, has become the latest registrar to sign up to sell .xxx addresses.

The company joins about 50 other registrars that have so far been approved by .xxx manager ICM Registry and accredited by ICANN to sell the names.

"A large number of our customers have spoken... and there is a demand for the controversial new domain name extension for both brand protection purposes and for new names," Go Daddy CEO Bob Parsons said in a statement.

Commanding about half the market for new domain registrations, Go Daddy is a critical partner for any new top-level domain that launches. Its prominent marketing of Colombia's .co domains was a big help in enabling the registry, .CO Internet, to sell over one million names in less than a year.

The company has not yet announced pricing, but other registrars have started advertising .xxx domains for a minimum of $75 per name per year – about ten times the price of the cheapest .com domain rates.

Go Daddy is best known in the US for its saucy TV commercials, particularly those it airs during the Super Bowl. Most recently, it put millions of red-blooded American males off their stroke when it used CGI to splice the head of 78-year-old comedienne Joan Rivers onto the scantily clad body of a voluptuous young glamour model.

There's arguably some synergy here.

ICM currently plans to launch a 30-day "sunrise" period, during which trademark holders can protect their brands by paying a one-time fee to block their brands in .xxx, in early September.

Prices as high as $650 for these blocks have caused some large trademark owners to cry foul, fearing a shakedown, but ICM also plans to put some of the strongest post-launch trademark protection mechanisms in place of any domain registry.

General registration in the new porn-only extension is expected to begin in the fourth quarter.

Some in the porn business, led by the California-based trade group the Free Speech Coalition, intend to boycott the addresses, or to buy their .xxx names purely for defensive purposes. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
TEEN RAMPAGE: Kids in iPhone 6 'Will it bend' YouTube 'prank'
iPhones bent in Norwich? As if the place wasn't weird enough
Consumers agree to give up first-born child for free Wi-Fi – survey
This Herod network's ace – but crap reception in bullrushes
Crouching tiger, FAST ASLEEP dragon: Smugglers can't shift iPhone 6s
China's grey market reports 'sluggish' sales of Apple mobe
Sea-Me-We 5 construction starts
New sub cable to go live 2016
New EU digi-commish struggles with concepts of net neutrality
Oettinger all about the infrastructure – but not big on substance
PEAK IPV4? Global IPv6 traffic is growing, DDoS dying, says Akamai
First time the cache network has seen drop in use of 32-bit-wide IP addresses
EE coughs to BROKEN data usage metrics BLUNDER that short-changes customers
Carrier apologises for 'inflated' measurements cockup
Comcast: Help, help, FCC. Netflix and pals are EXTORTIONISTS
The others guys are being mean so therefore ... monopoly all good, yeah?
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Storage capacity and performance optimization at Mizuno USA
Mizuno USA turn to Tegile storage technology to solve both their SAN and backup issues.
The next step in data security
With recent increased privacy concerns and computers becoming more powerful, the chance of hackers being able to crack smaller-sized RSA keys increases.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.