Feeds

Facebook under fire over Israel, transgender bullying

Mod squad overlooks teen bullies' page, took peace activists' down

SANS - Survey on application security programs

Facebook was under fire again yesterday from various groups for alleged inconsistency in its moderation – too quick, it was claimed, to take down material supporting non-mainstream causes, too slow to react in other cases.

dislikefacebook

First up, according to gay newspaper Pink News, was a homophobic Facebook group called The New Anti-Gay Movement. Its administrators boasted: "This page is for those of us [sic] against ALL gays, man and woman alike. Those of us who are tired of seeing them flaunt it like it is a badge of honor and acceptable. Spread it like wildfire. Suggest to all your friends."

In response to calls for the page's removal, the Facebook mods initially responded: "By definition this page does not in any way or form count as 'hate speech'. While there is a very thin line, this is on the proper side of it. It does not promote violence, intimidation, harassment or other misconducted [sic] actions."

The page did not survive long, attracting, at last count, some 15 or so adherents before Facebook canned it. Accusations of foot-dragging in this case – unlike an earlier page advocating violence against a pro-gay demo in Serbia, which survived several weeks of reports before being dismissed – may therefore be slightly premature.

More controversial is a complaint from FreedomOneWorld, a campaign partly orchestrated by reputable UK campaigners War On Want – and supported by such ne'er-do-wells as Billy Bragg and Jews for Justice in Palestine – that their Facebook page had been taken down. The group also said that links to their website had been blocked by Facebook.

As Billy Bragg wrote on the now-resurrected page: "The link that I posted to the OneWorld Freedom for Palestine site here yesterday has mysteriously disappeared. Are facebook actively censoring the debate about peace in the Middle East?

"When I click on the link that I posted yesterday this is the message I got: 'Sorry the link you are trying to visit has been reported as abusive by Facebook users'. I'd like to know what in the video was considered abusive and by whom."

Last up – and arguably most serious – is a tale of ordinary everyday bullying and incitement to violence. If the first two campaigns challenged Facebook moderation by presenting them with politically subtle argument over the nature of protest and free speech, the third, which appears to have taken Facebook rather longer to respond to, was a page entitled: "i'm a women [sic] LOL JK i'm the guard from poundland".

The page, apparently originating among a number of young persons in the Newcastle-on-Tyne area was little more than an attack on a security guard, working at extreme discount store Poundland, who also happened to be transgender.

Typical of the comments put up were: "anyone got a photo of the ugly tranny? Put it on here and have a giggle."

Another poster wrote: "a heard it wasn't even human but a reptile."

Various posters urged others to take photos, which were duly posted.

The page survived for a number of weeks, apparently unreported. This changed on Wednesday, when a piece by journalist and blogger Paris Scarlett Lees exposed the page to the transgender community and led to a flurry of reports both to Facebook and the local police, who are now investigating those who posted. Given that the page could be construed as going well beyond opinion and into the realms of incitement to violence, Facebook appear to have taken no action to remove it until after we spoke to their press office yesterday afternoon.

In response to the above, Facebook refused to be drawn on individual cases. A spokeswoman told us: "While we can't comment on individual cases, users and content on Facebook can be removed for a variety of reasons including bullying or harassing others, using fake details or posting content which contains nudity."

The above includes every item of content added to the site, from profile images, to photos or messages, all of which can be reported by people using the site.

All reports are prioritised before being dealt with by Facebook's user operations team, and then addressed in order of significance: so a report of grooming or harassment would be dealt with before a report of an account which has been locked out.

The spokeswoman concluded: "Content which breaks Facebook's rules, such as the pages you flagged, will be removed for breaching Facebook's terms as set out in our statement of Rights and Responsibilities.

"We encourage people to report anything they feel violates our policies using the report links which are on every page across the site. Our highly trained team of expert reviewers will then prioritise reports, remove any content or people in violation and escalate issues to law enforcement when appropriate." ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Lavabit loses contempt of court appeal over protecting Snowden, customers
Judges rule complaints about government power are too little, too late
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Whoever you vote for, Google gets in
Report uncovers giant octopus squid of lobbying influence
Putin tells Snowden: Russia conducts no US-style mass surveillance
Gov't is too broke for that, Russian prez says
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.