Phone, slab location data 'is personal' - EU watchdogs
Don't slurp my snail-trail
What you need to know about cloud backup
Data identifying mobile phone users' locations should count as personal data and receive a high level of protection, the EU's data protection watchdogs will tell the European Commission, according to a newspaper report.
If the Commission adopts the recommendation, provision for the protection of location-revealing data could be written in to the Commission's revised Data Protection Directive later this year.
Mobile networks record location data, but in the UK the information is only supposed to be available to law enforcement authorities through a court order obtained under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act (RIPA).
The New York Times reported an EU official as having said that the Article 29 Working Party is due to make its opinion public on Friday. The Article 29 Working Party is made up of data protection regulators from 27 member countries and is independent of the Commission.
A source from the organisation said it was "very likely" that it would adopt an opinion on geographic location, the NYT reported.
Matthew Newman, a spokesman for the Commission's vice president Viviane Reding, said that protecting personal data obtained through new technologies was a priority for the Commission. Reding is leading a review of European privacy laws.
"The Commission is currently analysing all forms of new technology and we will take into consideration social network sites and the rise of data-sharing like photos and the use of cloud computing and behavioural advertising when we reform the Data Protection Directive later this year," Newman said.
"The technology has moved on in leaps and bounds since the Directive came into force more than 15 years ago, so what we want to do is see how people are using the technologies and how that relates to personal data to make sure that people's fundamental rights are protected," Newman said.
Last month, researchers Alasdair Allan and Pete Warden claimed that versions of Apple's iPhone and iPad devices stored information about where the devices had been.
Files containing coordinates for longitude and latitude and the time that the information was recorded were automatically copied and stored, without protection, on a user's computer when the device connected to the machine, the researchers said.
"As far as we can tell, the location is determined by triangulating against the nearest cellphone towers. This isn't as accurate as GPS, but presumably takes less power. In some cases it can get very confused and temporarily think you're several miles from your actual location, but these tend to be intermittent glitches," Allan and Warden said.
"This information being stored on the device raises concerns about access by third-party iOS apps which collect data and share with advertisers; by police and border controls agencies that in many countries routinely look through phones without warrants; as well as access concerns if the phone is lost," Simon Davies, director of lobby group Privacy International said at the time.
Apple subsequently updated its iOS 4 operating system and said it did not track users' locations.
The European Commission is currently investigating Apple following the researchers' apparent discovery. The UK, Ireland, Germany, France and Italy have all said that they are looking into whether Apple broke national data protection laws.
In 2009, MPs criticised Google after the company established a system to allow mobile users to permit tracking of their location. Google argued that it anonymously processed the data and only recorded it in the first place if mobile users consented.
Copyright © 2011, OUT-LAW.com
OUT-LAW.COM is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.
COMMENTS
I think...
the principle at issue here is 'Should the devices be collecting and/or saving location data at all as a matter of course".
Clearly, some device users might like to take advantage of location based services and in this case they could be readily permitted the option within the device to record and provide location information. When they have completed this work a user should be permitted to rescind permission and reset data. But that is not a preferred option.
On Android I cannot opt out of sending data to all and sundry once I make use of location based services and that is, perhaps, the moot point.
Why do they have to lie?
"This information being stored on the device raises concerns about access by third-party iOS apps which collect data and share with advertisers;"
This is a lie. Apple store approved iOS apps can't access this data. This is only an issue if you jailbreak the phone as the location cache file sits outside the app sandbox.
Sometimes I'm not sure who's worst: the advertisers or these privacy groups who profit from scaremongering.
Except that...
... even if there were regulations, laws, and financial penalties.
The UK ICO would do everything it possibly could to obstruct prosecutions.
Because they are corruption, lazy, and incompetent.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Enabling efficient data center monitoring
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider