Feeds

Microsoft waves CentOS club at Red Hat

The open source enemy of my open source enemy is my friend

High performance access to file storage

Open...and Shut Red Hat is perhaps one of the most understated success stories in the software industry. Each quarter, the company registers roughly 20-percent year-over-year growth, fueled by partners that increasingly cement Red Hat's place at the center of the enterprise data center.

Despite repeated efforts, no other Linux vendor has come close to knocking Red Hat off its perch. Microsoft, in announcing support for CentOS, just may have taken a big step in that direction. The only competitor to cause Red Hat serious consternation is community Linux distribution CentOS.

For years, Red Hat has called out "unpaid Linux" as its chief competition, going so far as to report on "free-to-paid" deals on each quarterly earnings call. Winning against "free" is a big deal for Red Hat. Ironically, the same is true for Microsoft, which is playing a potentially dangerous game in supporting CentOS. Microsoft already fights the plague (or blessing, depending on your viewpoint) of piracy in China and elsewhere. Does it really want to encourage customers to adopt free operating systems, open source or otherwise?

Maybe.

Microsoft general manager Sandy Gupta declared to Open Source Business Conference attendees: "We have been told repeatedly by our customers that we have to work with other vendors to interoperate with different data center solutions." Solutions like CentOS. And most probably like Ubuntu, which was not part of Microsoft's announcement.

But I would hazard a guess that it's coming, as well as a massive shift to managing a new swath of vendors and communities as Microsoft seeks to reassert itself as the center of the enterprise ecosystem. Even as open source renders individual components of the cloud difficult or impossible to monetize, the meta-level of management becomes fertile ground.

In Microsoft System Center, the Redmond giant may be trying to position itself as the trusted, go-to source for management of all assets, proprietary and open source. In other words, Red Hat may simply be collateral damage in Microsoft's CentOS announcement. The grand vision is to control the cloud -- or, rather, enterprises' adoption of cloud computing - and not necessarily to turn the cloud into a Windows-only experience.

Microsoft has grown up, and grown out of its fetish with control of a narrow computing stack. Instead, it seems to have taken heterogeneity as a given in cloud computing, and it's hoping to instill Microsoft's dashboards and management tools at the forefront of the user experience. The data center may be a morass of different components, but the trend is toward datacenter-level APIs and virtualization. Microsoft wants to own these "choke points."

My question? When is Red Hat going to do the same? Microsoft is building interoperability into its solutions, while Red Hat holds a firm line on its openness-only pledge. The most open solutions are those that embrace what the customer already has, and is inclined to use. For Microsoft that means embracing CentOS. For Red Hat, could it mean embracing Windows.

The two companies have done the interoperability dance on virtualization. Is cloud next? And will it originate with Microsoft or Red Hat? Based on Microsoft's CentOS news, the answer may well be Microsoft, and that's to its credit, and possibly Red Hat's hurt. ®

Matt Asay is senior vice president of business development at Strobe, a startup that offers an open source framework for building mobile apps. He was formerly chief operating officer of Ubuntu commercial operation Canonical. With more than a decade spent in open source, Asay served as Alfreso's general manager for the Americas and vice president of business development, and he helped put Novell on its open source track. Asay is an emeritus board member of the Open Source Initiative (OSI). His column, Open...and Shut, appears twice a week on The Register.

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
Windows 8.1, which you probably haven't upgraded to yet, ALREADY OBSOLETE
Pre-Update versions of new Windows version will no longer support patches
Microsoft lobs pre-release Windows Phone 8.1 at devs who dare
App makers can load it before anyone else, but if they do they're stuck with it
This time it's 'Personal': new Office 365 sub covers just two devices
Redmond also brings Office into Google's back yard
Half of Twitter's 'active users' are SILENT STALKERS
Nearly 50% have NEVER tweeted a word
Batten down the hatches, Ubuntu 14.04 LTS due in TWO DAYS
Admins dab straining server brows in advance of Trusty Tahr's long-term support landing
Windows XP still has 27 per cent market share on its deathbed
Windows 7 making some gains on XP Death Day
Internet-of-stuff startup dumps NoSQL for ... SQL?
NoSQL taste great at first but lacks proper nutrients, says startup cloud whiz
US taxman blows Win XP deadline, must now spend millions on custom support
Gov't IT likened to 'a Model T with a lot of things on top of it'
prev story

Whitepapers

Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
HP ArcSight ESM solution helps Finansbank
Based on their experience using HP ArcSight Enterprise Security Manager for IT security operations, Finansbank moved to HP ArcSight ESM for fraud management.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.