The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Quiet May Patch Tuesday follows record April

The calm after the storm

Ensure Ease of Recovery with Asigra’s Agentless Software

Microsoft is giving hard-pressed sysadmins a bit of a breather this month with plans to release only two updates during the May edition of its regular Patch Tuesday monthly update cycle.

Just one of the two bulletins due to be published next Tuesday covers a critical update, in sharp contrast to the record-breaking crop of 17 bulletins addressing 64 vulnerabilities that arrived in April.

The critical update in May's batch involves an unspecified flaw in Windows, but only affects Windows Server 2003 and Server 2008. The second bulletin – rated important – means that Office XP, 2003, 2007 and 2004 for Mac will need patching.

The latest version of Microsoft's application suite is not affected by the flaw.

Despite the light patch load, security experts urge sysadmins not to dismiss the updates as unimportant. "Both bulletins are for remote code-execution vulnerabilities, so IT administrators should track them closely and address them quickly," said Wolfgang Kandek, CTO at vulnerability scanning services firm Qualys. ®

Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider

and why the hell...

...is Microsoft pushing out IE9 as a "critical" update? meaning it will automatically install on any machine with automatic updates set?

Doesn't this completely negate the "Browser Choice" crap that was all the rage earlier in the year?

OK so my client machines and servers don't have automatic updates enabled, but it's still a pain hiding the IE update on each machine.

2
0

Re: and why the hell...

Agree with the sentiments entirely but is there any reason you are causing yourself the admin headache of not using WSUS?

1
0
Anonymous Coward

not spreading FUD

Every machine I have been on recently has had this update pre-ticked.

You are right, it's not a "critical" update, it's an "important" update, but it WILL automatically install without user intervention... it has done it on a number of my users machines when they ran windows update without me telling them to.

0
0

More from The Register

Bjarne Again: Hallelujah for C++
Plus: Now officially OK to admit you never used STL algorithms
Interwebs taunt Sir Jony over Apple eye candy makeover
Hey Ive, Ive... add more unicorns, willya?
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
Red Hat to ditch MySQL for MariaDB in RHEL 7
So long, Oracle! Don't let the door hit you on the way out
Shy? Socially inadequate? Fiddling with your phone could help
App 'tells the brutal truth' about social inadequates' chatup lines
Java EE 7 melds HTML5 with enterprise apps
New release arrives with GlassFish, NetBeans support
 breaking news
'Office Facebook' firm Tibbr wants you to PAY for mobe-meetings app
Great idea. Punters won't cough for it though
 breaking news
The only Waze is Google: Ad giant tipped to gobble map app 'for $1.3bn'
Pac-Man-satnav-ish upstart in bidding war with Apple, Facebook
 breaking news
PM Cameron calls for modern, programmable computers! (We think)
IT education musings to G8 chiefs to mystify IT industry
Apple at WWDC: Sleek new iOS, death of the big cats, pint-sized Mac Pro
CEO Cook: 'The biggest change to iOS since the introduction of the iPhone'