Feeds

EU pay-by-tap accepts operator independence

GSMA not involved this time around

New hybrid storage solutions

The European Payments Council guidelines for NFC proximity payments are up for debate, and this time the operator isn't considered an essential component though still the preferred partner.

In its last paper on the subject the EPC worked with operator-consortium The GSMA to work out how payment applications should be installed onto a secure element embedded in the operator's SIM, but this time a greater variety of options is presented and interested parties are invited to comment by June 17.

The proposal (117-page PDF/1.9 MB) addresses the thorny question of where the secure element should reside, and thus who controls it. The three popular options: SIM, embedded and SC Card, are presented and while the report still comes down on the side of the SIM it admits that "some business-related aspects ... might prove to be challenging".

The quickest solution to deploy, according to the EPC, is one which uses a secure element embedded in a microSD card. Such a solution allows the issuing bank to own the secure element, and if the microSD includes an NFC antenna and radio stack (such as those being built by Device Fidelity), then no other integration is required.

However, a secure element on a microSD has no secure way of interacting with the screen or keypad of the phone, and so cannot be sure that communications are not being intercepted until standards are forthcoming.

Which is what the EPC document is all about: deciding which standards should be adopted to facilitate communications between the surprisingly large number of parties involved in the proximity-payment ecosystem.

The payment ecosystem

Note how the Mobile Network Operators (MNOs) are reduced to sitting in brackets

The document is aimed, primarily, at banks and payment processors, but it also highlights just how many parties intend to make money by facilitating proximity payments: quite possibly enough to threaten the viability of the whole idea. ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
Phones 4u slips into administration after EE cuts ties with Brit mobe retailer
More than 5,500 jobs could be axed if rescue mission fails
'Serious flaws in the Vertigan report' says broadband boffin
Report 'fails reality test' , is 'simply wrong' and offers ''convenient' justification for FTTN says Rod Tucker
This flashlight app requires: Your contacts list, identity, access to your camera...
Who us, dodgy? Vast majority of mobile apps fail privacy test
Apple Watch will CONQUER smartwatch world – analysts
After Applelocalypse, other wristputers will get stuck in
Shades of Mannesmann: Vodafone should buy T-Mobile US
Biting the bullet would let Blighty-based biz flip the bird at AT&T
Radio hams can encrypt, in emergencies, says Ofcom
Consultation promises new spectrum and hints at relaxed licence conditions
Drag queens: Oh, don't be so bitchy, Facebook! Let us use our stage names
Handbags at dawn over free content ad network's ID policy
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Top 5 reasons to deploy VMware with Tegile
Data demand and the rise of virtualization is challenging IT teams to deliver storage performance, scalability and capacity that can keep up, while maximizing efficiency.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.
Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops
Balancing user privacy and privileged access, in accordance with compliance frameworks and legislation. Evaluating any potential remote control choice.