Feeds

Apple component lock-ups jump 40%

$11bn in commitments leave a mere $55bn to play with

Gartner critical capabilities for enterprise endpoint backup

Apple has made commitments to spend $11bn in manufacturing and component expenditures, a new record for the company and a sign that Cupertino is working to lock up components in an increasingly competitive market.

"As of March 26, 2011," reads Apple's 10-Q filing to the US Securities and Exchange Commssion, "the Company had outstanding off-balance sheet commitments for outsourced manufacturing and component purchases of $11.0 billion."

The SEC 10-Q filing was made after Apple's 8-K filing of last week revealed that Apple's second-quarter 2011 profit had grown 95 per cent year-on-year, a level of performance that prompted CEO Steve Jobs to crow: "We're firing on all cylinders."

This $11bn figure – which equals one-sixth of Apple's $66bn nest egg – is a significant uptick in Cupertino's manufacturing and component commitments. In the company's 10-Q filing for its previous quarter, such commitments totaled $7.9bn. We'll do the math for you: that's an increase of just under 40 per cent.

One year ago, the commitments totalled $4.9bn, making the year-on-year growth a hefty 125 per cent.

This growth in both component-purchase commitments and manufacturing-cost planning reflects not only Apple's hedging against a tightening component market due to the increased display and NAND hunger of the burgeoning mobile market, but also Cupertino's confidence that iPad 2's sales will further blossom in its next fiscal quarter.

That is, if Apple can build them fast enough. In a conference call with reporters and analysts after Apple's second-quarter 2011 financial results were announced last week, company COO and Steve Jobs stand-in Tim Cook said: "The iPad has the mother of all backlogs, but we're working very, hard to get [it] out to customers as quickly as we can."

A 40 per cent increase in manufacturing and component commitments should help. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Kate Bush: Don't make me HAVE CONTACT with your iPHONE
Can't face sea of wobbling fondle implements. What happened to lighters, eh?
Apple takes blade to 13-inch MacBook Pro with Retina display
Shaves price, not screen on mid-2014 model
iPhone 6 flip tip slips in Aussie's clip: Apple's 'reversible USB' leaks
New plug not compatible with official Type-C, according to fresh rumors
FEAST YOUR EYES: Samsung's Galaxy Alpha has an 'entirely new appearance'
Wow, it looks like nothing else on the market, for sure
The agony and ecstasy of SteamOS: WHERE ARE MY GAMES?
And yes it does need a fat HDD (or SSD, it's cool with either)
YES YES YES! Apple patents mousy, pressure-sensing iVibrator
Fanbois prepare to experience the great Cupertin-O
Steve Jobs had BETTER BALLS than Atari, says Apple mouse designer
Xerox? Pff, not even in the same league as His Jobsiness
TV transport tech, part 1: From server to sofa at the touch of a button
You won't believe how much goes into today's telly tech
Apple analyst: fruity firm set to shift 75 million iPhones
We'll have some of whatever he's having please
prev story

Whitepapers

5 things you didn’t know about cloud backup
IT departments are embracing cloud backup, but there’s a lot you need to know before choosing a service provider. Learn all the critical things you need to know.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Build a business case: developing custom apps
Learn how to maximize the value of custom applications by accelerating and simplifying their development.
Rethinking backup and recovery in the modern data center
Combining intelligence, operational analytics, and automation to enable efficient, data-driven IT organizations using the HP ABR approach.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.