Feeds

Deep-space travel bad for astronauts' tickers, say boffins

Mice zapped with atom-smasher beam in risky* experiments

Build a business case: developing custom apps

Deep-space travel could be bad for the heart, report boffins. This has been established by blasting mice with an ion beam from a powerful atom-smasher, causing the luckless murines to develop artery damage of the sort that might result from exposure to powerful cosmic space radiation.

"Cosmic radiation is very different from X-rays and other radiation found on Earth," says Dr Dennis Kucik, pathology prof. "The radiation risks of deep-space travel are difficult to predict, largely because so few people have been exposed."

In fact the only people who have ever travelled beyond the Earth's protective magnetic fields are the 24 US astronauts who landed on or orbited the Moon during the Apollo missions of the 1960s and 70s. It's pretty difficult to draw any conclusions from what happens among such a a small group: but Kucik and his colleagues nonetheless suspected for other reasons that one particular type of cosmic radiation - to wit, the hail of high-energy iron ions which permeates space beyond Earth orbit - could have noticeable health effects once more people go into deep space for longer periods. The scientists thought that iron ions might cause thickening of artery walls, aka atherosclerosis.

In order to test this hypothesis they needed ideally to send some test mice into deep space, but this would naturally be expensive and time-consuming. However, it is possible to generate iron-ion radiation of the sort found out in the big black here on Earth, by using a powerful particle accelerator.

Accordingly Kucik and his colleagues placed a group of mice in a beam of high-velocity iron ions blasted out of a suitable atom-smasher at the Brookhaven lab in New York*. They found that the ion bombardment did indeed cause negative health effects of the sort expected.

"At 13 weeks it was surprising and quite remarkable that we already could see permanent damage — an irreversible thickening of the artery wall where it had been exposed to radiation," says Kucik's fellow boffin Janusz Kabarowski.

The scientists say that high-velocity iron ions are a particular headache for spacecraft and space-suit designers. Other kinds of space radiation can be blocked using shielding: for instance quite thin lead sheets will stop X-rays. But when iron ions hit metallic shields, they can generate secondary radiation on the other side which may be just as bad.

When and if deep-space exploration begins - at the moment US aspirations appear to have slipped back into the 2020s for this - studies like Kucik and Kabarowski's will feed into the design of the ships and the preventive health measures used to protect the astronauts.

The Orion spacecraft, now in ground testing, is the only recent ship intended for deep space. It was meant from the outset for missions beyond low Earth orbit, but the initial focus was on shorter journeys probably within the Earth-Moon system: Orion was conceived under the Bush administration plan which called for a return to the Moon before reaching out for Mars. Most of that plan has now been scrapped, but Orion itself lives on.

Lockheed, manufacturer of the Orion, has said that it could be used for a longer-duration mission to an asteroid as a stepping stone towards a Mars mission: but company spokesmen proposing such a plan did admit that the radiation-exposure issue for such long duration Orion flights "would require further study".

Deep-space ships of the 2020s might use very different propulsion methods, perhaps nuclear powered so as to cut down on journey time. Such ships might have sufficient electricity available on board to employ much more radical radiation shielding methods such as the magnetic forcefield bubbles conceptually outlined as being "relevant to spacecraft" a few years back.

The atomsmasher mouse study paper is published in the journal Radiation Research. ®

Bootnote

*Ignoring the obvious risks that the mice might develop super powers, or perhaps begin glowing green and swell to an enormous size before embarking on a destructive mouse-zilla style rampage.

The Essential Guide to IT Transformation

More from The Register

next story
Just TWO climate committee MPs contradict IPCC: The two with SCIENCE degrees
'Greenhouse effect is real, but as for the rest of it ...'
Asteroid's DINO KILLING SPREE just bad luck – boffins
Sauricide WASN'T inevitable, reckon scientists
Flamewars in SPAAACE: cooler fires hint at energy efficiency
Experiment aboard ISS shows we should all chill out for cleaner engines
Boffins discuss AI space program at hush-hush IARPA confab
IBM, MIT, plenty of others invited to fill Uncle Sam's spy toolchest, but where's Google?
NASA Mars rover FINALLY equals 1973 Soviet benchmark
Yet to surpass ancient Greek one, however
Famous 'Dish' radio telescope to be emptied in budget crisis: CSIRO
Radio astronomy suffering to protect Square Kilometre Array
BEST BATTERY EVER: All lithium, all the time, plus a dash of carbon nano-stuff
We have found the Holy Grail (of batteries) - boffins
prev story

Whitepapers

Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Consolidation: The Foundation for IT Business Transformation
In this whitepaper learn how effective consolidation of IT and business resources can enable multiple, meaningful business benefits.
Backing up Big Data
Solving backup challenges and “protect everything from everywhere,” as we move into the era of big data management and the adoption of BYOD.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.