Feeds

Ubuntu's high-risk Linux Narwhal beta floats

Multi-touch or bust?

Reducing the cost and complexity of web vulnerability management

Canonical's short march towards multi-touch success (or its slow slide in to oblivion) is a step closer to completion. On Thursday, it released the Ubuntu 11.04 beta.

Codenamed Natty Narwhal, Ubuntu 11.04 is the first version of the Linux distro that defaults to Unity, the multi-touch interface we were once told was for touch-only on devices.

The change is taking place as Canonical combines both the desktop and netbook versions of Ubuntu.

Announcing the change in interfaces earlier this year, Ubuntu creator Mark Shuttleworth had said the Gnome shell wasn't heading in the same direction as Ubuntu. The sticking point was use of GL graphics and 3D, he said.

Unity is a massive undertaking for the distro, not just because it has spent six years on Gnome, but because it's also fundamentally changing the look of Ubuntu and how applications are installed and accessed by users.

Unity puts application icons down the side of the screen, and it features keyboard navigation and launcher activation through keyboard shortcuts.

Unity could be the making or the breaking of Ubuntu, by positioning it as a user-friendly Linux for a future of touch-based systems, or it could frustrate and lose those already using it.

Elsewhere, Ubuntu 11.04 attempts to bring the web closer to the desktop with a Software Center for application downloads that features App-Store-like user reviews and ratings.

Thr distro includes Firefox 4.0 as the standard browser, LibreOffice 3.3.2, and Banshee 1.9.5 as the standard music player.

On the server side, the Amazon-like Eucalyptus 2.0.2 jostles for room with OpenStack in the Universe is a technology preview, with a recent snapshot of the 2011.2 release codenamed Cactus. Shuttleworth made it sounds like Ubuntu will in future be picking either Eucalyptus or OpenStack as its blessed architecture for building private clouds.

"In the cloud, we'll have to tighten up and make some firm decisions about the platforms we can support for 12.04 LTS," he said enigmatically while announcing Ubuntu 11.10 - the successor to Ubuntu 11.04 - in March. ®

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
'Windows 9' LEAK: Microsoft's playing catchup with Linux
Multiple desktops and live tiles in restored Start button star in new vids
Not appy with your Chromebook? Well now it can run Android apps
Google offers beta of tricky OS-inside-OS tech
New 'Cosmos' browser surfs the net by TXT alone
No data plan? No WiFi? No worries ... except sluggish download speed
Greater dev access to iOS 8 will put us AT RISK from HACKERS
Knocking holes in Apple's walled garden could backfire, says securo-chap
NHS grows a NoSQL backbone and rips out its Oracle Spine
Open source? In the government? Ha ha! What, wait ...?
Google extends app refund window to two hours
You now have 120 minutes to finish that game instead of 15
Intel: Hey, enterprises, drop everything and DO HADOOP
Big Data analytics projected to run on more servers than any other app
prev story

Whitepapers

Providing a secure and efficient Helpdesk
A single remote control platform for user support is be key to providing an efficient helpdesk. Retain full control over the way in which screen and keystroke data is transmitted.
Saudi Petroleum chooses Tegile storage solution
A storage solution that addresses company growth and performance for business-critical applications of caseware archive and search along with other key operational systems.
Security and trust: The backbone of doing business over the internet
Explores the current state of website security and the contributions Symantec is making to help organizations protect critical data and build trust with customers.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.