Feeds

Google gets biennial privacy audit after Buzz blunder

Mountain View Chocolate Factory in settlement with FTC

Combat fraud and increase customer satisfaction

Google has agreed with the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to undergo regular privacy audits for the next 20 years, after bolting its ill-conceived Buzz social network on to Gmail in early 2010 without first seeking the consent of its users.

"When companies make privacy pledges, they need to honour them," said FTC chairman Jon Leibowitz.

"This is a tough settlement that ensures that Google will honour its commitments to consumers and build strong privacy protections into all of its operations."

Under the proposed settlement, as well as the audits every two years Mountain View is also required to implement a "comprehensive privacy program". Additionally, Google is barred from "future privacy misrepresentations".

The FTC complaint charged Google with violating its privacy policies by using information provided for its Gmail service in the company's Buzz social network.

"Today, we've reached an agreement with the FTC to address their concerns. We'll receive an independent review of our privacy procedures once every two years, and we'll ask users to give us affirmative consent before we change how we share their personal information," said Google privacy director Alma Whitten.

"We'd like to apologise again for the mistakes we made with Buzz. While today's announcement thankfully put this incident behind us, we are 100 per cent focused on ensuring that our new privacy procedures effectively protect the interests of all our users going forward."

In February 2010 Buzz landed in the mailboxes of Google, and the service had not been tested outside the company. At the time we noted it was an unusual move for a company that once seemed to pride itself on deeply testing a product in beta via Google Labs.

By default, Buzz exposed users' most frequent Gmail contacts to the public internet. You did have the option of hiding the list from the public view, but many complained that the checkbox that let you do so was not prominently displayed. Within days, Google agreed to move the checkbox to a more prominent position, and it rejiggered the way it handles user contacts. But this didn't stop complaints from privacy advocates and a spate of lawsuits.

The backlash was immediate, with many complaining that an online email service should remain entirely separate from Google's social networking desires.

The Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC), which is a respected US public advocacy outfit, was quick to file a complaint with the FTC over Google Buzz.

In its complaint, EPIC said at the time that the service violated user expectations, diminished user privacy, and contradicted Google's privacy policy.

The group even questioned whether Buzz violated federal wiretap law. The US Electronic Communications Privacy Act prevents operators of "electronic communication" services from disclosing certain subscriber information without consent – including "addressing" information – and the privacy watchdog believed this "may" have applied to Buzz.

In its statement, the FTC made no mention of those allegations today, but it did allege "violations of the substantive privacy requirements of the US-EU Safe Harbor Framework."

The proposed settlement (PDF) now awaits acceptance by the Commission. Meanwhile, the public can wade in here.

The terms of the settlement will apply to Google worldwide, as Google's infrastructure operates worldwide. ®

Update: This story has been updated to better characterise the original release of Buzz and to point out that the settlement will apply worldwide.

SANS - Survey on application security programs

More from The Register

next story
Android engineer: We DIDN'T copy Apple OR follow Samsung's orders
Veep testifies for Samsung during Apple patent trial
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
One year on: diplomatic fail as Chinese APT gangs get back to work
Mandiant says past 12 months shows Beijing won't call off its hackers
Don't let no-hire pact suit witnesses call Steve Jobs a bullyboy, plead Apple and Google
'Irrelevant' character evidence should be excluded – lawyers
EFF: Feds plan to put 52 MILLION FACES into recognition database
System would identify faces as part of biometrics collection
Big Content goes after Kim Dotcom
Six studios sling sueballs at dead download destination
Ex-Tony Blair adviser is new top boss at UK spy-hive GCHQ
Robert Hannigan to replace Sir Iain Lobban in the autumn
Alphadex fires back at British Gas with overcharging allegation
Brit colo outfit says it paid for 347KVA, has been charged for 1940KVA
Jack the RIPA: Blighty cops ignore law, retain innocents' comms data
Prime minister: Nothing to see here, go about your business
prev story

Whitepapers

Designing a defence for mobile apps
In this whitepaper learn the various considerations for defending mobile applications; from the mobile application architecture itself to the myriad testing technologies needed to properly assess mobile applications risk.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Securing web applications made simple and scalable
In this whitepaper learn how automated security testing can provide a simple and scalable way to protect your web applications.