Feeds

Coalition to float prototype for single government web domain

Fate of Directgov in doubt

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

UK.gov is once again fiddling with the idea that a single government web domain will save cash and improve its shoddy IT strategy record.

The Cabinet Office set out plans for the government's IT strategy this morning, in which it claimed it would reduce costs, offer better support to smaller tech firms and commit to "mandatory open standards" in the public sector.

The wide-ranging proposals, undersigned by Cabinet Office minister Francis Maude, follow a review by the government's digital darling Martha Lane Fox in November 2010.

She claimed last year that billions of pounds could be saved if the Coalition agreed to her advice to shift more services online. At the time Fox said that the team running the Directgov website should be a "citizens' champion with sharp teeth" and added that government portals should be simplified to help cut costs.

Today Maude confirmed that Tom Loosemore, the man behind TheyWorkForYou.com – who previously served as a digital media strategy adviser at Ofcom – had been hired to head up work on a prototype for a single government web domain.

In his foreword about the plans, Maude was quick to offer a big fat disclaimer about the management of IT on a grand scale.

"Government information and communications technology (ICT) has a really bad name," he wrote. "Much of this is unjustified. All big organisations – whether in the public or private sector – have examples of failure in delivering big ICT projects and programmes.

"In the public sector, the failures tend to be very public, while in the private sector, it is easier to keep them in decent obscurity. It is not obvious that the record of government is significantly worse than that of other big organisations."

Maude went on to admit that there had been "significant failures" and said the Coalition was "determined to do things better".

Over the next two years the government plans to bring in changes with details about how it will deliver the proposals being published this summer by the Chief Information Officer (CIO) Delivery Board.

"For too long, government has wasted vast amounts of money on ineffective and duplicate IT systems. We need to ensure that frontline services have the tools to do their job to deliver effective public services," said Maude, who claimed millions of pounds could be saved.

"We will cut out duplication and wastage by sharing more of our assets across government and using common systems.

"We will end the oligopoly of big business supplying government IT by breaking down contracts into smaller, more flexible projects. This will open up the market to SMEs and new providers."

However, the strategy will need to secure the backing of other government departments and HM Treasury, leaving the possibility open for some tweaking of the plans before they are bedded in.

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
BIG FAT Lies: Porky Pies about obesity
What really shortens lives? Reading this sort of crap in the papers
Assange™ slumps back on Ecuador's sofa after detention appeal binned
Swedish court rules there's 'great risk' WikiLeaker will dodge prosecution
You think the CLOUD's insecure? It's BETTER than UK.GOV's DATA CENTRES
We don't even know where some of them ARE – Maude
prev story

Whitepapers

Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Getting started with customer-focused identity management
Learn why identity is a fundamental requirement to digital growth, and how without it there is no way to identify and engage customers in a meaningful way.
10 threats to successful enterprise endpoint backup
10 threats to a successful backup including issues with BYOD, slow backups and ineffective security.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
The hidden costs of self-signed SSL certificates
Exploring the true TCO for self-signed SSL certificates, including a side-by-side comparison of a self-signed architecture versus working with a third-party SSL vendor.