Drive genius?
Looking at comparison data against the likes of the DS411+, the DS411slim compares favourably. As 2.5in drives are currently limited to 1TB each for a maximum of 4TB in the DS411slim, in terms of storage capacity it compares to two-bay 3.5in systems such as the DS211 series.
Compactness comes at a price
A quick spec comparison against the DS211 shows that the DS411slim consumes around 6W less power in active duty. Up against the pocket-friendly DS211j, the DS411 slim takes 8W less despite a faster CPU clock speed and double the RAM. And while these benefits are tempting, along with being considerably smaller, it’s the cost of storage that is the main issue with the DS411slim.
Verdict
A 1TB 3.5in disk can be yours for around £35 these days. However, the cost of a 1TB 2.5in disk is almost double that. The DS411slim’s price doesn’t compensate either, at around £230 for this unpopulated Nas.
If cost and storage are your main considerations and you can live with a lower spec, the two-bay DS211j costs around £160, and loaded with two 2TB HDDs at around £65 each you can achieve in less than £300 what you would need over £500 to do with the DS411slim. Certainly compactness carries a premium, moreover, the DS411slim is a fantastically innovative piece of kit that performs pretty much as well as its bigger four-bay brethren. ®
More Network Storage Box Reviews |
||||
 Synology
DS411+ |
 Cloud Engines
Pogoplug |
 Dane-Elec
myDitto |
 Verbatim
MediaShare |
 HP MediaSmart
Server EX490 |
Synology DS411slim Nas box
COMMENTS
meh...
Compared to the Proliant microserver - 4+1 Sata bays, near-silent, raid 0+1+JBOD, 1GB ram, 250GB hd included and dual core amd cpu and ati graphics, easily runs windows, *nix or freenas. £150 after £100 cash back from ebuyer.
A little bigger of course, but WAY better value.
@Thruxton10
You're completely missing the point (several in fact):
that old PC may be cheaper, but is is also way noisier, consumes way more power and produces more heat. I have several NAS boxes humming along quietly in an almost closed cabinet. The equivalent amount of PCs would not fit in there and instantly overheat when they would.
A bit like taking your big car that seats 5 (or 7) to get some bread at the local bakery 500m away, instead of taking your bike. Overkill. Buy that bike now....
Nothing particularly "loathing" about jbod
Nothing particularly "loathing" about jbod
Jbod on a NAS with metadata on your media player main drive is the best way to store media. If the disk dies, oh well, whatever, you just get rip again from the original media.
With JBOD + metadata elsewhere the drives spin down when not in use and only the drive which contains the media being played at a particular time is spun up. Also, you may find yourself in a situation with multiple clients and multiple streams - junior version 1 refusing to watch the same movie as junior version 2 (and so on by induction). In that case if you organize media by topic/age group you will end up with flawless performance even if everyone in the house decides to be a movie junkie at the same time.
The price is also reasonable. If you assemble a DIY in a decent living room case using a mini-ITX motherboard (though that will hold 8-10 drives, not 4) it will cost about the same. Ditto for power usage. The numbers are pretty decent, but not out of the ordinary. A DIY system with a Via CPU can easily match them. The couple of DIY NAS-es I have in the house definitely manage similar numbers :)
@Petur
You're missing several advantages:
No 1 is that if the PC develops a fault, say PSU goes bang or memory fails... easy swap with replacement parts, so I can be back online within 15 minutes. you try doing that with a failed synology.....
No 2 free NAS software such a FreeNas supports far more than an off the shelf solution. try the following features, Upnp, CIFS, NFS, Itunes, RSync, Unison, iSCSI, Support for UPS'es, Samba, Dynamic DNS, BitTorrent, AFP and SNMP, amongst other features. it also supports the use of PuTTY for those who like to Telnet in.
No 3 is i can choose to put in a specific hardware raid card such as adaptec or more than one, dependent on the number of PCI slots, and configure the disc arrays exactly how i want, not have synology tell what I can and can't do.
No 4, the home brew NAS is upgradeable, more memory? faster processor? higher spec board? no problem.
No 5 One of my freenas boxes has a 64 bit PCI server motherboard, allowing the use of 64 bit PCI raid cards, I've bench marked its data throughput and its in well in excess of 200MBit/s (provided you have a gigabit card of course) which is more than what the Synology can do.
The point?
at 2.5", it's not much of a nas. For a fraction of the price you can get a 4TB dual disk simple NAS and trump this thing's storage, or for roughly the same price (chassis and drives) a 4 bay expandability 3.5" model with all the bells and whistles. I really don't see the point of this unit, as slight noise increase of a 3.5" unit shoudl be irrelevant considering a NAS likely would not be in the same room anyway (network cables can go anywhere... I have my NAS in a closet).
Also, I gravitate to the QNAP line. They have significantly more software features beyond what Synology offers, and i actually use several of them... For a price within a few bucks on a $500-900 setup, I'll take the QNAP.
