Feeds

Shuttleworth sees fewer clouds in Ubuntu's future

'Firm decisions' needed

The essential guide to IT transformation

There are some tough decisions ahead about which cloud open sourcers should support in the next major version of Ubuntu.

Canonical and Ubuntu founder Mark Shuttleworth has said that "firm decisions" are required about the cloud platforms that can be supported.

Shuttleworth made the announcement while revealing the animal-inspired code name for Ubuntu 11.10, due later this year. Ubuntu 11.10, the successor to 11.04 due next month, will be named Oneiric Ocelot – our dictionary, by the way, defines oneiric as "of or relating to dreams or dreaming".

Apparently looking beyond 11.10 to the next Long Term Support (LTS) release edition of Ubuntu, though, Shuttleworth talked of the need to be more selective on the distro's cloud platform picks. "In the cloud, we'll have to tighten up and make some firm decisions about the platforms we can support for 12.04 LTS," he said here.

Shuttleworth pretty much leaves it there, raising more questions than offering answers.

Instead, he expects there will be a "feisty debate" on the subject at the forthcoming Ubuntu Developer Summit, scheduled for May 9-13 in Budapest.

"UDS in Budapest will be full of feisty debate on that front, I'm sure, but I'm equally sure we can reach a pragmatic consensus and start to focus our energies on delivering the platform for widespread cloud computing on free and flexible terms," Shuttleworth said.

Ubuntu's Natty Narwhal, scheduled for next month, will pack APIs for two cloud architectures: OpenStack and Eucalyptus.

Shuttleworth confirmed the dual-cloud stance after The Reg reported that OpenStack APIs were being added to the forming Linux distro via the Ubuntu repositories by members of the Ubuntu community also working on OpenStack.

Ubuntu, however, had made a strong early show of support for Eucalyptus, with Shuttleworth understood to have personally invested in Eucalyptus Systems - the open-source company trying to sell services around Eucalyptus and commercially maintain the system. Shuttleworth invested before chief executive Marten Mickos took the helm in March 2010.

Since those early days, Eucalyptus has been put on the back foot by a swell of industry backing for OpenStack, with Canonical joining the OpenStack community in February.

Shuttleworth said in January that Ubuntu 11.04 would feature both clouds. "We will have both OpenStack- and Eucalyptus-based cloud options in Ubuntu 11.04 in April," he said.

On the flip side, there's uneasiness in the OpenStack community. Despite the project's open credentials, a single company has grown to dominate OpenStack's management structure: project cofounder RackSpace.

In an apparent attempt to assuage these concerns, Rackspace last week said that it was expanding OpenStack's newly renamed project policy board - previously the project oversight committee - which will now have 12 seats with eight elected and four nominated.

Its unlikely that Canonical would completely drop one cloud for the other. Rather, one might be deprecated and simply live on in the Ubuntu universe – or multiverse – getting updates from members of the community rather than from Canonical's own engineering team.

Shuttleworth, meanwhile, used the unveiling of the Oneiric Ocelot name to rally developers to keep pushing the Linux distro. Natty Narwhal will see major changes in look-and-feel as it moves to a new Unity interface as the official standard, and demotes Gnome.

He also called out support for Qt, the cross-platform and cross-device development framework until very recently owned by Nokia but now a casualty of Nokia's Windows Phone partnership with Microsoft.

"We'll need to keep up the pace of innovation on all fronts post-Natty. Our desktop has come together beautifully, and in the next release we'll complete the cycle of making it available to all users," Shuttleworth said.

In a nod to the hard work in making the move to Unity, he said: "Natty is a stretch release: we set out to redefine the look and feel of the free desktop. We'll need all the feedback we can get, so please test today's daily, or A3, and file bug reports! Keep up the discipline and focus on the Narwhal, and let's direct our daydreaming to the Ocelot." ®

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
No, thank you. I will not code for the Caliphate
Some assignments, even the Bongster decline must
Kaspersky backpedals on 'done nothing wrong, nothing to fear' blather
Founder (and internet passport fan) now says privacy is precious
TROLL SLAYER Google grabs $1.3 MEEELLION in patent counter-suit
Chocolate Factory hits back at firm for suing customers
Mozilla's 'Tiles' ads debut in new Firefox nightlies
You can try turning them off and on again
Facebook, Google and Instagram 'worse than drugs' says Miley Cyrus
Italian boffins agree with popette's theory that haters are the real wrecking balls
Sit tight, fanbois. Apple's '$400' wearable release slips into early 2015
Sources: time to put in plenty of clock-watching for' iWatch
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.