Feeds

Microsoft's IE slipping into Chrome release cycle?

More frequent, smaller releases

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

Microsoft is holding firm to its Internet-Explorer release schedule rather than follow Mozilla or Google by stepping up the pace of deliveries - officially, at least.

Senior director of IE business and marketing Ryan Gavin speaking to The Reg at the launch of the Internet Explorer 9 Release Candidate (RC) this month dismissed Mozilla's new plan to deliver four versions of Firefox on users PCs, Macs and mobiles during 2011.

We're still waiting for one for Mozilla to stop hesitating and deliver Firefox 4.0, but that's another story.

The plan inside Microsoft is for steady releases that deliver substantial changes rather than follow Firefox, or Google that slipped out six updates to Chrome in 2010.

Gavin told The Reg during Microsoft's IE event in San Francisco: "Iteration and putting out more version numbers doesn't equal substantial updates."

"Look at what we did with the platform preview model - we had substantial updates. Developers told us: 'That's great - you are respecting my time - when you are putting something out, there's something with substance and it's new and it's tested'."

Gavin conflates a little, and picks on the numerous Firefox betas saying it's hard to know what each contained.

Turns out, though, there's been almost as many platform previews of IE9 as there have been Firefox betas - 12 versus eight since March 2010, with one code drop a beta in September. Aside from Microsoft's obsessive and incessant tinkering with JavaScript's performance, there were three real landmarks in the IE9 story.

The Chakra Jscript engine and support for CSS3 and SVG that came with Microsoft's first build, HTML5 video and audio tags that appeared with build three; and the minimalist, Chrome-like interface that officially debuted with last year's beta.

The beta made the IE9 Chrome recede into the background and be consumed by a site, while Microsoft's browser combines the address and search boxes into a single OneBox.

Microsoft, with all the browser makers, has also chucked in its response to the US government's call for greater respect for consumer's privacy on the web with its do-not-track list technology called Tracking Protection.

Firefox, meanwhile, has added hardware acceleration, support for Windows 7 multi-touch, a new JavaScript engine combined with changes to juice the speed of JavaScript, some Chrome-like tabs, a "faster" UI, and a do-not-track header along with various bug fixes along the way in different betas. HTMTL 5 video, audio and geo-location were already there, as was SVG.

Despite what Gavin says about not following Mozilla down the path of more releases, Microsoft has stepped on the accelerator for IE9. IE8 took a year between the first public beta and delivery in March 2009. Microsoft's chief executive Steve Ballmer has put IE9's release "in the next month of so" with the IE team preparing a press and analyst event at the tech and arts indie fest South By South West next month in Austin, Texas. If March is the date, Microsoft will have cut the time from beta to product in half.

Speaking to The Reg, Gavin told us: "See how quickly we go from beta to RC and from RC to final release. I think that cadence is something you can expect to continue."

Will this continue after IE9 is delivered? We'll have to see.

And while Gavin dismissed four Firefox browsers, it's not Firefox that's setting the pace for Microsoft - it's Chrome.

During the San Francisco RC-event all Microsoft's speed comparisons were against Chrome. Plus there's that homage to Chrome's all-in-one address and search box.

With six releases in 12 months Google has certainly cranked up the pressure on Microsoft, in addition to Mozilla. The browser saw its JavaScript performance improved, support was added for HTML5 with the inclusion of APIs for geolocation, web sockets, App Cache and file drag and drop, Adobe's Flash Player and Google's open-source WebM video codec were added, full compliance with ACID 3 was achieve and security was tightened up.

Mozilla is following Google down the route of more frequent releases. Microsoft is also sliding in that direction. With HTML5 and JavaScript added, though, will Microsoft have anything substantial left up its sleeve to deliver?

Security for virtualized datacentres

More from The Register

next story
UNIX greybeards threaten Debian fork over systemd plan
'Veteran Unix Admins' fear desktop emphasis is betraying open source
Netscape Navigator - the browser that started it all - turns 20
It was 20 years ago today, Marc Andreeesen taught the band to play
Redmond top man Satya Nadella: 'Microsoft LOVES Linux'
Open-source 'love' fairly runneth over at cloud event
Return of the Jedi – Apache reclaims web server crown
.london, .hamburg and .公司 - that's .com in Chinese - storm the web server charts
Chrome 38's new HTML tag support makes fatties FIT and SKINNIER
First browser to protect networks' bandwith using official spec
Admins! Never mind POODLE, there're NEW OpenSSL bugs to splat
Four new patches for open-source crypto libraries
Torvalds CONFESSES: 'I'm pretty good at alienating devs'
Admits to 'a metric ****load' of mistakes during work with Linux collaborators
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.