Facebook users subjected to more clickjacking
Your consent without your approval
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
Facebook users have been subjected to another round of clickjacking attacks that force them to authorize actions they had no intention of approving.
The latest episode in this continuing saga, according to Sophos researchers, is a set of campaigns aimed at Italian-speaking users of the social network. The come-ons promise shocking videos about such things as the real ingredients of Coca Cola. Instead, they are forced into registering their approval of the videos using Facebook's “Like” button.
“As more and more criminals discover how successful attacks via Facebook can be, we can expect the tried-and-trusted techniques of the English-speaking world to be cloned elsewhere around the globe,” Sophos researcher Paul Baccas writes.
Clickjacking is a term that was coined in 2008 by web-application security gurus Jeremiah Grossman and Robert “RSnake” Hansen. It describes attacks that allow malicious website publishers, or their users, to control the links visitors click on. They are typically pulled off by superimposing an invisible iframe over a button or link. Virtually every browser is vulnerable, although many come with safeguards that can make exploitation harder.
The No-Script extension for Firefox also provides some protection, although not always: users are often forced to allow Twitter and other websites to run Flash and other scripts in order to avail themselves of basic features. The functionality often gives attacks all they need to carry out the attacks.
The latest round of attacks, which Sophos said are also being seen in Japanese and Cryillic, are similar to clickjacking exploits unleashed last year on Facebook that forced users to share content without their express approval. ®
COMMENTS
How to stop this?
I'm assuming that to use the "like" feature you have to be granted an API key from facebook, yet I see no way of reporting these malicious pages to facebook so that said key can be revoked...
nail head hit
seanmon. Well said.
Browser technology has crept well beyond its original design brief without proper considerationof side effects. So now the naive get caught and the wise cripple their browsers.
The smarter you make the browser apps the more vulnerabilities are introduced. The current iteration of facebook simply doesn't work with noscript on. m.facebook.com does though.
letters and/or digits.
Getting fed up of the resurgence of sites that insist on javascript being enabled. Time was, you coded your basic functionality server-side and used javascript for a bit of non-essential (although admittedly often useful) bling. When did the web 2.0 babbies decide to abandon this completely sensible practice? Only themselves to blame I reckon.

IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider