The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Two councils hit with big fines for laptop blunder

Unencrypted data gaffe hits Hounslow, Ealing

What you need to know about cloud backup

The UK's information watchdog has slapped two London councils with hefty penalties for failing to encrypt personal data on laptops that were stolen by thieves.

Ealing Council and Hounslow Council were both found to be in serious breach of the Data Protection Act, ruled the Information Commissioner's Office today.

It said two laptops that contained details of approximately 1,700 people were stolen from an employee's home. Around 1,000 of the individuals were clients of Ealing Council and almost 700 were on Hounslow Council's books.

Although the laptops were password-protected, the data itself was unencrypted, noted the ICO.

The failure of both councils, whose out-of-hours service is provided by Ealing Council, to encrypt the laptops was in breach of council policy.

"There is no evidence to suggest that the data held on the computers has been accessed and no complaints from clients have been received by the data controllers to date," said the ICO.

However, it handed down a £80,000 penalty to Ealing Council and a £70,000 penalty to Hounslow Council because the theft of the unencrypted laptops represented what it described as "a significant risk to the clients' privacy."

The ICO said Ealing Council breached the Data Protection Act by issuing an unencrypted laptop to an employee having ignored its own policies on the handling of sensitive client information.

Hounslow breached the Act by failing to have a written contract in place with Ealing Council to ensure the procedure for operating the service was adequately securing client data.

The ICO said that both councils had since tightened their security policies and contacted the individuals affected by the unencrypted data blunder.

"Both council have paid the price for lax data protection practices," said ICO deputy commissioner David Smith.

"I hope all organisations that handle personal information will make sure their houses are in order - otherwise they too may have to learn the hard way." ®

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

The problem with this

is that the people whose data was lost, are going to be among those who actually have to pay the fine.

13
0

Bad

And the fine will of course be paid for by the tax payer. Thanks guys.

I'd much rather the idiot with the laptop and the idiot who gave them it were sacked.

13
0

No they haven't

"Both council have paid the price for lax data protection practices," said ICO deputy commissioner David Smith.

No, it's the residents of Ealing and Hounslow that will pay the price when the next set of Council Tax bills hit their carpets next month.

8
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA whistleblower to tech firms, Obama: 'Grow a pair!'
Ed Snowden: Email tracking grabs 'IPs, raw data, content, headers, attachments, everything'
Google flings another £1m at online child sex abuse vid CRACKDOWN
See, see, we're trying, ad giant tells Daily Mail UK.gov
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
NSA: We COULD track you by your phone ... if we WANTED to
Honestly, too much work, can't be bothered