Feeds

Rev slammed for PAYE failure

Software problems, dirty data and overpaid senior staff

Intelligent flash storage arrays

Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs failed in its duty to provide a proper computer system to work out how much Pay As You Earn taxpayers should be paying.

In reality HMRC was unable to process PAYE in anything like real time and has now run out of time to collect tax owed from before April 2007.

The Public Accounts Committee said HMRC had failed to deliver an acceptable level of service. It knew in late 2009 that as many as seven million people had either overpaid or underpaid their tax bills – but did nothing about it until September 2010.

In January 2010 it began issuing 25 million tax codes for 2010-2011 without finding out why "the number of coding notices was massively in excess of its forecast".

The committee of MPs said the Rev had failed to understand the impact of dirty data. The PAC said it wanted to see evidence by the end of 2011 that this systemic failure had been rectified.

The MPs also said the Revenue should properly account for the cost of its failure.

MPs also questioned why HMRC re-employed its acting chief information officer Deepak Singh on a three-month contract on the equivalent of £600,000 a year. The committee noted: "This was after he had been unsuccessful in the competition for the permanent post." Singh was paid £150,000 to stay on for three months and he also received £19,200 in "outplacement services" to help him get another job.

MPs suggested the Revenue make more of an effort to replace senior staff, especially when their leaving dates are known well in advance.

No one knows how much tax has been lost as a result of the problems – estimates suggest £1.4bn had been underpaid and £3.0bn had been overpaid and will need to be refunded.

About 15 million people were given wrong tax claims even though implementation of the system was delayed twice.

There's more on HMRC's PAYE failure here. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
The 'fun-nification' of computer education – good idea?
Compulsory code schools, luvvies love it, but what about Maths and Physics?
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Ex-US Navy fighter pilot MIT prof: Drones beat humans - I should know
'Missy' Cummings on UAVs, smartcars and dying from boredom
Yes, yes, Steve Jobs. Look what I'VE done for you lately – Tim Cook
New iPhone biz baron points to Apple's (his) greatest successes
Lords take revenge on REVENGE PORN publishers
Jilted Johns and Jennies with busy fingers face two years inside
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
Edward who? GCHQ boss dodges Snowden topic during last speech
UK spies would rather 'walk' than do 'mass surveillance'
Doctor Who's Flatline: Cool monsters, yes, but utterly limp subplots
We know what the Doctor does, stop going on about it already
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Why and how to choose the right cloud vendor
The benefits of cloud-based storage in your processes. Eliminate onsite, disk-based backup and archiving in favor of cloud-based data protection.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.