The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds
  • print
  • alert

Counting the cost

Obviously Sata-to-USB 3.0 adapters need significant work before SSDs see their full potential unleashed in these external enclosures. They are, however, still a fair bit faster than their platter-spinning brethren.

iomega SSD

Performance claims err towards the theoretical and the price seems unrealistic too

Verdict

Certainly, Iomega is putting down a marker to show its presence in this current generation of SSD meets USB 3.0 storage, however, it is significantly more expensive than Kingston’s offering. If you must have black aluminium, by all means buy Iomega’s SSD Flash Drive, but if you’re sensible, you’ll go to Kingston and pay £100 less for the 128GB drive and £220 less for its 256GB variant. ®

More USB 3.0 Gear Reviews...

Kingston
HyperX Max
SSD
Buffalo
USB 3.0
ExpressCard 34
Kingston Technology
DataTraveler
Ultimate 3.0
LaCie
Rugged
USB 3.0
60%
Iomega SSD USB 3.0

Iomega SSD 128GB USB 3.0 drive

Sleek SSD drive with USB 3.0 interfacing.
Price: £183 (64GB), £325 (128GB), £624 (256GB) RRP More Info: Iomega's SSD Flash drive page

Can we get more tests?

Say, same drive on USB2 as well as same contained SSD (what's inside this chassis) connected to eSATA and Firewire 800. Lets also see USB3 compared based on a common USB3 including chipset, a USB3 card in a 1x slot, and a USB3 card in a full performance PCI configuration.

In 90% of cases, USB3 is capped at PCI1x speed anyway, then add in controller, OS, and CPU overhead, and they perform at barely more (if at all) SATA speeds... Why pay so much more for USB 3 (and add yet another port), where eSATA is so close in speed as to be (in the near term) irrelevant, except for people moving TB at a time, which can;t be done with these small drives anyway....

1
0

All very nice

Thanks but I think I'll save the 650 sovs, buy a couple of 1TB traditional USB drives in small form factor and spend the rest on something fun for the the kids, like a new console!

Thanks anyway!

( 650 flipping quid for 256GB! Breathe in, breathe in slowly and calmly! )

1
0
Anonymous Coward

That's 238.4GB

I still blame Iomega for claiming that 1MB=1,000,000 bytes, henceforth making it a de facto standard. Bastards, I'll never forgive them. That and the click of death. And the subsequent denial. And my 250GB drive dying. And my 750MB drive consistently killing my 250MB disks. It took me a while to learn my lesson, but I'll never buy from them again. Especially at this price!

1
0

aaah

zip drives. The only reason I will never buy iomega. No matter how cheap or fantastic. I have never forgiven you Iomega

/shakes fist as sky.

0
0

Gold Plated

For now its expensive, but then I imagine the same would have been said years and years ago with 5 inch HD's with under a gig of storage.

Wonder if it still works if someone drives over it in a tank

0
0

More from The Register

Android is a mess and needs sprucing up, admits chief
Can Google really fix it? It isn't in control any more
New Lumia 925: This, loyalists, is the BIG ONE you've waited for
Nokia veep drills high-end master plan for El Reg
Android device? Ooohhhh, you mean a Samsung phone
Koreans nabbed nearly all the Q1 profits – more even than Google
Review: HP Pavilion 14 Chromebook
All roads lead to Chrome?
Borked your iDevice? Pay EVEN MORE to have it fixed by Applecare
Or scream at their hapless techies on their forums
Euro PC shipments plummet into bottomless pit of DOOOOM
11th quarter of decline, 20pc drop on last year - Gartner
Report: AT&T dropping Facebook phone after dismal sales
Turns out folks won't buy that for a dollar