Feeds

Nasuni grabs cloud development cash

Following the money into the clouds

The essential guide to IT transformation

Probably the last storage venture capital cash raising exercise of 2010 is following the dash to the cloud by pumping $15m into cloud filer startup Nasuni.

Nasuni received $8m in a previous funding round in March 2009, so it has now received a total of $23m for the development of its business and software appliance: a lot of money for a software-only company in quite a short time period.

The software comes as a virtual machine, supporting VMware, Citrix and Hyper-V, and sends encrypted and deduplicated file data to a cloud storage service such as Amazon's S3, Azure, Iron Mountain, Nirvanix, Peer 1 Hosting and others. This cloud storage shows up on user's local systems as a networked drive.

There is a local 500GB cache where retrieved data from the cloud is decrypted and re-hydrated. Nasuni says its cloud filer gateway makes the storage of primary file data in the cloud feasible.

Twenty-three million dollars is a lot of money for software development and probably buys a lot of partner business infrastructure development too. The whole cloud gateway area is a seething hotbed of development as BridgeSTOR, Cirtas, Nasuni, Riverbed, StorSimple and others build interface appliances, both hardware and software, to represent cloud storage as local storage to users, and provide accelerated and secure transmission of data to and from cloud storage service suppliers. The race is on to build out a cloud storage access infrastructure faster and better than anybody else.

El Reg wonders if cloud storage service suppliers will start supplying their own branded front end devices and so attempt to capture users and prevent them going to other storage service providers. Another possibility is that separate storage virtualisation products, such as IBM's SAN Volume Controller, Hitachi Data Systems USP-V and NetApp's V-Series could have functionality added to enable them to virtualise both networked storage in the data centre and networked storage out in the cloud and present it as a single virtual pool or file name space.

Cloud storage gateways look to be the hottest storage technology going from the venture capitalists' point of view. It's a pound to a penny that the major storage suppliers will end up building their own software and hardware to compete for business here or buy one of the startups in another round of storage consolidation. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.