Feeds

Three cops spanking in mobile user ranking

O2 scores in Which?-u-like ethereal pollage

The essential guide to IT transformation

O2 rates more than twice as high as Three in customer service, according to readers of Which? Magazine, who rated the country's smallest operator as worst of a piss-poor bunch.

The survey asked more than 10,000 Which? readers to rate 75 companies providing ethereal services, and found that First Direct Bank was the most popular, while AOL Broadband provided the worst customer experience. But among mobile network operators, O2 was streets ahead of the rest, and Three* the worst of the worst.

First Direct has the advantage of only having rich customers**, while those working at AOL Broadband must be really tired of telling people the company still exists - which can't help morale and probably reflects badly on customer service, but why Three should rate badly is a mystery.

Not that we're saying Three is famed for its customer service, but is O2 really so much better? In the overall field of 75 companies, Three came in at number 69, Orange, T-Mobile and Vodafone all ranked around 60, but O2 does way better, slotting in at number 24. So it's not really a matter of customers hating Three, more that they adore O2.

Customer service is really hard for a network operator - customers are a disagreeable bunch who don't understand why their phone won't work, don't understand why their bills are so high and are known for pretending to be dead in order to avoid paying. The network operator is expected to provide technical support for thousands of handset models, physics instruction for those who can't get coverage and constantly justify tariffs when cut-throat competition already keeps them low.

The question, therefore, is not what Three and the others are doing wrong, it is how O2 manages to do it right and what the other operators should be doing if they want to emulate that success. ®

* That's "Three", not "3" or "3UK". Apparently the numbering thing has become too much for the company, and we're told that the word is now the preferred monicker - sorry for any confusion.

** Your correspondent is not, apparently, rich enough - not that I'm bitter or anything.

Secure remote control for conventional and virtual desktops

More from The Register

next story
6 Obvious Reasons Why Facebook Will Ban This Article (Thank God)
Clampdown on clickbait ... and El Reg is OK with this
So, Apple won't sell cheap kit? Prepare the iOS garden wall WRECKING BALL
It can throw the low cost race if it looks to the cloud
EE fails to apologise for HUGE T-Mobile outage that hit Brits on Friday
Customer: 'Please change your name to occasionally somewhere'
Time Warner Cable customers SQUEAL as US network goes offline
A rude awakening: North Americans greeted with outage drama
We need less U.S. in our WWW – Euro digital chief Steelie Neelie
EC moves to shift status quo at Internet Governance Forum
BT customers face broadband and landline price hikes
Poor punters won't be affected, telecoms giant claims
prev story

Whitepapers

Endpoint data privacy in the cloud is easier than you think
Innovations in encryption and storage resolve issues of data privacy and key requirements for companies to look for in a solution.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Advanced data protection for your virtualized environments
Find a natural fit for optimizing protection for the often resource-constrained data protection process found in virtual environments.
Boost IT visibility and business value
How building a great service catalog relieves pressure points and demonstrates the value of IT service management.
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.