Iran admits cyberattack hit nuke programme
Imadinnerjacket's centrifuges unspun
Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery
The Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad today seemed to confirm speculation that the Stuxnet worm obstructed his regime's nuclear ambitions.
"Several" uranium enrichment centrifuges were damaged by the virus, he told a press conference.
"They were able to create problems on a limited basis for some of our centrifuges by software installed in electronic equipment," Ahmadinejad said.
Security analysts have speculated for months that Stuxnet is a digital weapon aimed at Iran's nuclear facilities at Bushehr and Natanz.
Reverse engineering of the worm has revealed it is able to infect the Siemens industrial control systems used at the plants. It then makes subtle, damaging changes to frequency converter drives that operate in a frequency range used in uranium enrichment.
"Our specialists stopped that and they will not be able to do it again," Ahmadinejad said.
Speculation as to the source of Stuxnet has centred on Israel, which is known to have advanced cyber attack capabilities.
Ahmadinejad also dismissed Wikileaks' disclosures about Iran's relations with its Arab neighbours. He claimed the US had deliberately leaked the cables, which show the king of Saudi Arabia calling for military action against his regime, adding "we don't give any value to these documents".
Separately, Iran also blamed Israel and the West for two explosions today targeting its nuclear scientists. One was killed and one injured in simultaneous operations. Assassins on motorbikes had reportedly attached bombs to the scientists' moving cars and detonated them from a distance. ®
COMMENTS
Does murdering scientists count as terrorism?
I guess not, if the USA or Israel is doing it.
You're taking the mickey, right?
Please tell me you're taking the mickey.
Stuxnet and its follow ons do not require internet-facing systems.
They may not even require USB sticks.
The device used to program PLCs is called (amongst other things) a "programming panel". These days it probably has Windows inside. You connect the "panel" to the plant admin LAN for genuine valid reasons. The panel gets infested with a (by definition undetectable) 0day exploit that is already on the LAN. The panel is then moved (physically or virtually) onto the automation LAN which does not have, has never had, and does not need, a connection to The Internet, and at that point the infected panel also compromises all the relevant boxes on the automation LAN.
Job done.
Get a clue Fred, or make yourself like as much of an idiot as Brian did.
IT infrastructure monitoring strategies
Agentless Backup is Not a Myth
Top 10 SIEM implementer’s checklist
Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner
Requirements Checklist for Choosing a Cloud Backup and Recovery Service Provider
