The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

NHS enables Facebook to track surfers on health info website

Privacy experts say 'ick, germs'

Agentless Backup is Not a Myth

Privacy experts have expressed dismay at a decision by the NHS to allow Facebook and Google to track users on one of its sites.

The NHS has integrated its NHS Choices site into the Facebook Connect platform, so that surfers can express an interest ("like") for pages on the site and share content with their friends and contacts on Facebook. Google is also able to track the behaviour of individuals on the NHS Choices website, online privacy firm Garlik warns.

Garlik is sharply critical of the designers of the site. Mischa Tuffield, a developer at Garlik, criticised the design decisions as either "ill judged or ill informed".

Most of Tuffield's criticism focuses on the tie-up between the health information site and Facebook Connect which "opens the door to third-party tracking", even in cases where a user is not logged into Facebook at the time of visiting the NHS Choices site.

The site also uses analytics services from Google and Webtrends, something Garlik argues should not be trusted to a third-party supplier, as outlined here. However, it reserves the bulk of its criticism for the tie-up with Facebook.

Tuffield writes: "What right has the NHS to share any information about the browsing of NHS Choices with Facebook? The Like button is engineered such that even if it is not clicked, it still passes information about the user to Facebook, even if they are not logged into Facebook at the time of the visit."1

Garlik, which was the first to warn of the issue, was able to establish that tracking took place using internet logging tools. It knows from this exercise that individually identifiable data is exchanged between NHS Choices and Facebook, but not how it is used.

Users can be expected to be viewing content on NHS Choices that most might normally be expected to want to keep private. Garlik offers an example of a young mother looking for information on post-natal depression, but many others can be imagined.

The sharing is mentioned in the NHS website privacy policy, something few average punters would read, and a point that cuts little ice with Garlik or other critics.

Andy Thomas, Garlik’s managing director, said: "The fundamental issue here is that the NHS believes it is acceptable to share information about users' browsing habits with third parties. This appears to have been a conscious decision, and the NHS believes that a statement buried away in a privacy policy makes it OK."

"NHS Choices has either wilfully decided that sharing the pages visited by all Facebook users with Facebook is acceptable, or has implemented the technology without understanding how it works."

The issue has been taken up by Tom Watson MP, who wrote to the Health Secretary on Tuesday to express his concern that the "NHS is allowing Google, Facebook, and others to track your nhs.uk browsing habits, regardless of the fact that people use the page to seek medical advice".

"The NHS Choices website is used by members of the public in order to find out facts about ailments they may be suffering from and these illnesses could cause an individual embarrassment if the information was leaked," he writes.

Watson wants the link between NHS Choices and Facebook Connect to only exist in cases where users opt in to link the services, rather than (as now) by default.

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

This is completely wrong

A visit to the NHS website should be treated like a visit to the doctor's surgery, i.e. private. Instead data gets pushed out to Google and Facebook. I'm having a hard time thinking of another company which could treat people's personal data worse than these two do...

13
0

You couldn't make it up

There's only one icon that fits this. Have the NHS officials completely lost their minds? Did any of them have a mind to lose?

Why on earth would a web site that provides health advice need a "Like" button? Why would anybody want to share information about their diseases with a horde of Facebook users?

It sounds like this is another absurd attempt by the public sector to play the trendy vicar.

10
0

I, for one

cant effin wait to see the end of facebook and its dog....

My hatred for it is almost consuming but everywhere i go, i hear about someone who's wronged someone else because of what they wrote/said etc on effin facebook.

Dear facebbok, please, die, quietly and quickly and may you and your ilk never walk on the face of this planet again...

Facebook and the NHS, thanks a fucking bunch...

9
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
Number of cops abusing Police National Computer access on the rise
Only a telegram from the Queen can get you off it
 breaking news
NSA PRISM snoop-gate: Won't someone think of the children, wails Apple
10,000 things probed, mostly about missing kids, Alzheimer patients, we're told
Flash flaw potentially makes every webcam or laptop a PEEPHOLE
But it's a Google problem - Chrome only, insists Adobe
Internet fraud still stings suckers
Australians twice as gullible as Americans
 breaking news
NSA PRISM-gate: Relax, GCHQ spooks 'keep us safe', says Cameron
Whatever they are up to, it's all above board, we're told
 breaking news
Yahoo! joins! rivals! in! PRISM! data! request! admission!
Keep calm and carry on using American tech firms, folks
PRISM snitch claims NSA hacked Chinese targets since 2009
Snowden suddenly looks safer in Hong Kong after revelations
 breaking news
US chief spook: Look, we only want to spy on 6.66 BEELLLION of you
Americans assured they are not in the NSA's sights
Speech-to-text drives motorists to distraction
Will talking to you mean I crash into that car up ahead, Siri?
DHS warns of vulns in hospital medical equipment
Has your doctor's anasthesia machine been hacked?