Feeds

Google advertisers howl over 'sudden quality score drop'

Second howl in four weeks

High performance access to file storage

For the second time in a month, Google advertisers are complaining of a sudden drop in "quality scores" on the company's AdWords platform, and some say this is forcing them to pay more for the same ad placements.

In an email to The Register, a Google spokesman said that at this point, the company "believes" that current complaints are related to a bug that hit AdWords in late October. That bug, according to the company, did not actually affect prices on the system, but merely the way quality scores were reported to advertisers.

"We don't believe it to be a new issue, but are looking into [the situation]," the spokesman said. "In the meantime, we're telling our advertisers to continue to focus on core metrics like [click through rate] and net [cost per click]. It's also worth noting that the holidays can be a time of much change as advertisers optimize their campaigns for the shopping season."

Some advertisers are convinced that some sort of sudden change in the system is indeed affecting their cost per click. "My campaign [has] also been hit.....so frustrating because we pay big money for this service and I have had to increase my bids drastically to maintain ranks I have always had," one advertiser says in a post to Google's help forum. "I doubt AdWords will reimburse us for the increased cost or lost sales. Shame this time of year. I am seriously looking into other platforms for the first time."

Another advertiser — based in the UK — tells The Register that as his quality score has dropped, his cost per click has jumped from about £0.90 to £1.40 on one campaign. He spends about £1,800 a month on the service. AdWords places ads according to a "second price auction." You end up paying only if someone clicks on your ad, and the amount you pay is determined by the bid of the advertiser ranked just below you and your respective quality scores, Google's measure of an ad's "quality."

In an email to The Register, a Google spokesman says the company has long been aware of a bug in the system that seemed to drive quality scores down in late October. According to the company, this bug only affected the way quality scores were reported to the user — not the actual score used by the system to place ads.

"We're aware of an issue, and have responded in a thread on the forum and with this post pinned to the top of the forum," the spokesman said, pointing us to a forum post from late October.

"Many accounts are experiencing an unexpected drop in quality score for high performing keywords, starting around the 24th/25th of October 2010. This appears to be a reporting only issue, meaning that we display the quality score as incorrectly low in the account interface, while ad serving itself is not affected," the post reads. "Please know that our engineers are looking into this as a top priority."

Another post from the same late October day indicates the problem will soon be fixed. "This issue was limited to the reporting of Quality Score, and the fix should be live for all within the next 24 hours. For those keywords with a status of Low search volume, the fix should be live within the next few days."

Apparently, it was fixed in some way, because advertisers stopped complaining. But the complaints popped up again on November 19. And many users seem to think this is a separate problem. "After the recent Quality Score bug and shake out things stabilized for my account for a few weeks. But today once again something is going down. My whole average QS across my entire account is taking a pounding today. Is anyone else experiencing this?" asked one forum poster.

Multiple advertisers have complained to The Register directly. "Quality Scores on my campaign have dropped from 10/10 to 6/10 and even 4/10," another UK-based advertiser tells us. "My ads are still being displayed in the right place (top) however the cost has slightly increased."

And many others on Google's forum believe that the change in their reported quality scores has coincided with a change in cost per click. "Our CPCs to be on first positions tripled because of low QS and not sure if we should wait and not make any changes?" says another posted. "This 6 day glitch is not very tolerable Google! Loads of money on the table." ®

High performance access to file storage

More from The Register

next story
Audio fans, prepare yourself for the Second Coming ... of Blu-ray
High Fidelity Pure Audio – is this what your ears have been waiting for?
Dropbox defends fantastically badly timed Condoleezza Rice appointment
'Nothing is going to change with Dr. Rice's appointment,' file sharer promises
Did a date calculation bug just cost hard-up Co-op Bank £110m?
And just when Brit banking org needs £400m to stay afloat
MtGox chief Karpelès refuses to come to US for g-men's grilling
Bitcoin baron says he needs another lawyer for FinCEN chat
Zucker punched: Google gobbles Facebook-wooed Titan Aerospace
Up, up and away in my beautiful balloon flying broadband-bot
Apple DOMINATES the Valley, rakes in more profit than Google, HP, Intel, Cisco COMBINED
Cook & Co. also pay more taxes than those four worthies PLUS eBay and Oracle
It may be ILLEGAL to run Heartbleed health checks – IT lawyer
Do the right thing, earn up to 10 years in clink
France bans managers from contacting workers outside business hours
«Email? Mais non ... il est plus tard que six heures du soir!»
prev story

Whitepapers

Mainstay ROI - Does application security pay?
In this whitepaper learn how you and your enterprise might benefit from better software security.
Five 3D headsets to be won!
We were so impressed by the Durovis Dive headset we’ve asked the company to give some away to Reg readers.
3 Big data security analytics techniques
Applying these Big Data security analytics techniques can help you make your business safer by detecting attacks early, before significant damage is done.
The benefits of software based PBX
Why you should break free from your proprietary PBX and how to leverage your existing server hardware.
Mobile application security study
Download this report to see the alarming realities regarding the sheer number of applications vulnerable to attack, as well as the most common and easily addressable vulnerability errors.