Feeds

ASA rules 'Bare T*Ts Project' ad offensive

Viewers of adult channels have a right to be offended

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

The ASA has ruled that an ad for a smutty premium rate phone service breached taste guidelines after it was broadcast on a sex channel at 6.40am.

The ASA recounts that the ad on the Tease Me 2 channel featured mock documentary footage titled The Bare Tits Project, and stated "In 2009 4 students went out to make a naughty documentary in Epping Forest... They never returned but the footage was found a year later."

Viewers were then exposed to footage of "three women, who were frequently topless, in a woodland setting". Viewers were told “if you want to talk to some really naughty girls, call the number on the screen now”.

The ad included scrolling onscreen text detailing costs and waring "this is an adult service and is NOT a dating service." They were also told "calls are with off-screen girls".

The ad rankled with one viewer, who saw the ad on Tease Me 2 at 6.40am, and who "challenged whether the nudity in the ad was offensive, particularly given the time of day at which it was broadcast".

The ASA itself challenged whether the "premium rate service was of a sexually explicit nature and therefore whether it should have been broadcast only on an encrypted element of an adult entertainment channel."

Tease Me 2 said the ad was broadcast by mistake due to an operator error. It accepted the ad could cause offence to some viewers, but pointed out it was broadcast on a "clearly signposted adult entertainment channel". It therefore "disagreed that the ad was likely to cause serious or widespread offence or that the depiction of nudity contravened any generally accepted moral, social or cultural standards".

It added that the ad was clearly distinguishable from editorial content.

The ASA upheld both claims. It accepted the ad had been broadcast in error, and that offence was unlikely to be "serious or widespread if appropriately scheduled". But it added it had been seen by a viewer in the morning, and was likely to cause offence, and should only be seen on an encrypted channel.

Which presumably means that even if you are perusing a channel like Tease Me 2 first thing in the morning, you have not abdicated your right to be offended by what you see. ®

Choosing a cloud hosting partner with confidence

More from The Register

next story
Facebook pays INFINITELY MORE UK corp tax than in 2012
Thanks for the £3k, Zuck. Doh! you're IN CREDIT. Guess not
Facebook, Apple: LADIES! Why not FREEZE your EGGS? It's on the company!
No biological clockwatching when you work in Silicon Valley
Happiness economics is bollocks. Oh, UK.gov just adopted it? Er ...
Opportunity doesn't knock; it costs us instead
Sysadmin with EBOLA? Gartner's issued advice to debug your biz
Start hoarding cleaning supplies, analyst firm says, and assume your team will scatter
YARR! Pirates walk the plank: DMCA magnets sink in Google results
Spaffing copyrighted stuff over the web? No search ranking for you
Don't bother telling people if you lose their data, say Euro bods
You read that right – with the proviso that it's encrypted
Apple SILENCES Bose, YANKS headphones from stores
The, er, Beats go on after noise-cancelling spat
prev story

Whitepapers

Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
A strategic approach to identity relationship management
ForgeRock commissioned Forrester to evaluate companies’ IAM practices and requirements when it comes to customer-facing scenarios versus employee-facing ones.
High Performance for All
While HPC is not new, it has traditionally been seen as a specialist area – is it now geared up to meet more mainstream requirements?
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.