The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Virtualization for small business: Where's the pay-off?

Too big, too expensive, too painful – or just fine?

  • print
  • alert

Cloud storage: Lower cost and increase uptime

Webcast Does Virtualization pay off for small business?

Small and medium-sized businesses are virtualizing their servers, but at a much slower rate than larger enterprises. Some are put off by the high licensing costs, some can't spare the time to do it, some don't know how to.

If you're in one of these categories, join us on November 11 at 10am PST for our virtualization for SMBs webcast.

Joining us for this one-hour live interactive broadcast will be our analyst friend Dan Olds, from Gabriel Consulting, and a couple of old pros from IBM and VMware. The Register Tim Phillips hosts the event, and he wil handle your questions and keep the presenters focused.

Think of the webcast as free consulting. And at the end of the event, we hope you’ll have some tangible solutions to some of your challenges.

If you can’t make it on the day, don’t worry. If you register today we’ll email you when the recorded version is available for your viewing pleasure.

Does Virtualization pay off for small business?

Steps to Take Before Choosing a Business Continuity Partner

SMB

Small Business virtualization isn't looking for High Availability or any marketing fluff out of VMs. They're looking to pack the usual compliment of 5 to 7 servers into 1 or 2 boxes and put them in a room that doesn't need special cooling requirements. Cramming all the features of a PDC, BDC, File Server, Mail Server, Sharepoint (or otherwise) server, <insert misc server(s) here> into one or two Windows Server installs is a Bad Idea (tm). Hence the need for virtualization in a SMB environment. None of these systems will tax a Core2-based crap SMB server, let alone real server hardware. Purchasing a single (or perhaps two) more-than-capable servers and consolidating it all down will give the environment reduced power and cost, not to mention the bonus of modularity for individual server reboots (as needed), however at the moderate concern of single-point-of-failure (see "perhaps two servers"). Is there server sprawl? Perhaps. Just not physically.

1
0
Anonymous Coward

Live Broadcast

Do I need a TV licence for this?

0
0

More from The Register

 breaking news
What's HP got under wraps? Looks awfully flash and tape shaped
What happens in Vegas won't stay there - we've got the details
Microsoft borks botnet takedown in Citadel snafu
Stupid Redmond kicked over our honeypots, wail white hats
SCO vs. IBM battle resumes over ownership of Unix
Zombie lawsuit back and wants to suck the brains out of Linux
IBM's $1bn layoffs latest: Now axe swings in US, Canada - reports
Union claims 121 storage bods canned after dismal sales
NetApp musters muscular cluster bluster for ONTAP busters
Storage array OS overhauled to juggle more nodes, go down on you, er, less
HP adds 'Haswell' Xeon E3s to entry ProLiant servers
Gussies up MicroServer for SMBs, adds baby switches
Buffalo herds DDR3 RAMs into DriveStation's spinning rust corrals
Claims cache-packed gear keeps up with flash drives
'THINNEST EVER' spinning terabyte beauty slips out of WD fabs
Size-zero drive packs a whopping 143GB per millimetre