Feeds

Prism provides Bocada's backup vision

Release 2 is faster and better

The essential guide to IT transformation

Backup may be broken, as FalconStor and others argue, but it's still out there, being used every day, and has to be used as best it can. Bocada's release 2 of its Prism backup reporting tool helps large enterprises do just that.

There are around 500 large enterprises using Bocada's reporting tools to manage more than 300,000 backup clients and servers, meaning an average of 600 backup instances per customer. Imagine you run a fleet of 100 vehicles of different types, using petrol, diesel or electricity, and you have to monitor fuel costs, insurance costs, breakdowns, accident rates and cost of ownership. Now your firm buys another and you manage two car fleets of a 100 cars each with different fleet management systems.

Then your firm buys another, and another and so on, until you are running six car fleets distributed across dozens of business units with 600 vehicles in total. That's what Bocada does with backup; it enables its customers to monitor and manage a backup infrastructure with multiple and different backup products spread across a large enterprise.

The multiple car fleet management analogy is apt when you consider multi-tenant occupation of cloud data centres and the need for the service provider to optimise backup processes across the multiplicity of tenants and their various heterogeneous backup products and schedules.

Prism release 2 has performance improvements for the creation of reports from very large data sets, like those from companies with hundreds if not a thousand-plus backup events in any one period.

There are five new treading reports. The first provides an overall view of the amount of data being backed up; the second looks at length of time it takes backup processes to run and how that is changing; the third looks at the use of backup media and its change over time; and the fourth looks at the number, type and distribution of backup errors over time. The fifth and final report provides a view of how overall storage changes over time.

These are all simple enough things when you have one backup product and one data centre, but can become horribly complicated to calculate when you have dozens of backup products and hundreds of backup events happening every week in multiple data centres.

Bocada has also announced a migration package for users of its Bocada Enterprise product to move to Prism. ®

Boost IT visibility and business value

More from The Register

next story
Pay to play: The hidden cost of software defined everything
Enter credit card details if you want that system you bought to actually be useful
HP busts out new ProLiant Gen9 servers
Think those are cool? Wait till you get a load of our racks
Shoot-em-up: Sony Online Entertainment hit by 'large scale DDoS attack'
Games disrupted as firm struggles to control network
Silicon Valley jolted by magnitude 6.1 quake – its biggest in 25 years
Did the earth move for you at VMworld – oh, OK. It just did. A lot
VMware's high-wire balancing act: EVO might drag us ALL down
Get it right, EMC, or there'll be STORAGE CIVIL WAR. Mark my words
Forrester says it's time to give up on physical storage arrays
The physical/virtual storage tipping point may just have arrived
prev story

Whitepapers

Top 10 endpoint backup mistakes
Avoid the ten endpoint backup mistakes to ensure that your critical corporate data is protected and end user productivity is improved.
Implementing global e-invoicing with guaranteed legal certainty
Explaining the role local tax compliance plays in successful supply chain management and e-business and how leading global brands are addressing this.
Backing up distributed data
Eliminating the redundant use of bandwidth and storage capacity and application consolidation in the modern data center.
The essential guide to IT transformation
ServiceNow discusses three IT transformations that can help CIOs automate IT services to transform IT and the enterprise
Next gen security for virtualised datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.