The Register® — Biting the hand that feeds IT

Feeds

Nielsen cops to iPad stat cock-up

Fewer iPad download virgins

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

The customarily competent media-survey firm, The Nielsen Company, has backtracked on its startling claim that one-third of all iPad users have never download an app. The company now says that the number of download virgins is fewer than one in ten.

"This article and the related download have been amended to reflect updates to the percentage of iPad users in the survey downloading apps," now reads a post on the company's blog describing the study in which the download stats appear.

The "related download" to which Nielsen's brief update notification refers is a précis of the survey firm's recent study, released last week, entitled "Connected Devices: Does the iPad Change Everything?" When it was first released, that "fact sheet" [sic] included a chart that looked like this:

Nielsen's original iPad app-download chart

Nielsen's original take on iPad app-download stats

That chart has since been amended, and now looks like this:

Nielsen's updated iPad app-download chart

'Did we say 32 per cent? Excuse us — we meant 9 per cent'

Face, meet egg. Not only does Nielsen come out looking foolish in this cock-up, but so do the BBC, MSNBC, InformationWeek, Wired, and many other media outlets — including The Reg — that reported the original figures.

How did Nielsen manage to first misstate the number of iPad download virgins by a massive 350 per cent? What prompted them to restate their figures? Did they receive a phone call from some Cupertinian corner office?

We've asked Nielsen to comment on their turnaround, but didn't immediately receive an answer any more satisfying than "we'll get back to you." ®

Regcast training : Hyper-V 3.0, VM high availability and disaster recovery

Possibly a simple answer...

The first chart shows what was purchased from the ipad, the second shows what was download to the pad from an existing account including new and old (pre ipad) purchases.

Basically if you have paid for an app on your phone you dont need to buy it again for the pad.

Cupertino would like to point out that saying 35% have not downloaded is incorrect as although they have not purchased new they have downloaded existing purchased apps.

The iPad and iPhone are interchangable in respect of devices on an account and will hence forth be known by the common moniker of iPhads.

2
0

or..

There were lots of maxi pad users who were confused to what the term App meant in relation to their sanitary product

4
2

points 4 u

that is also a good point, especially where there are more than 1 iDevice per household.

My wife has never downloaded an app on her own, but she has near a hundred on her device.

1
0

More from The Register

1,000 O2 staff chose redundancy over Capita
Betrayal, or just decent terms?
Google launches broadband balloons, radio astronomy frets
A careless Loon could blind the square kilometre array
 breaking news
Pttow! Ofcom kicks hams out of MoD bands
Geet off my land, you, you ... 'secondary user'
 breaking news
Now you can use your phone instead of your wallet at the ATM, too
Blimey, these little paper towels out of the vending machine are really expensive
 breaking news
UK.gov's £530m bumpkin broadband rollout: 'Train crash waiting to happen'
Whitehall whispers of damning watchdog report next month
 breaking news
MySpace zaps millions of teens' tearful rants, causes wave of angst
'Your crappy redesign SUCKS, I wanna read my blogs' screech users
 breaking news
Microsoft Office 365 on iPhone NOW: No, we're not making this up
Word, Excel, Powerpoint for your pocket-stroker
 breaking news
EU signs off on eCall emergency-phone-in-every-car plan
GPS and a mobe in every car - do you suppose the NSA would fancy that?