Feeds

Tape backup could be binned soon

Imation gets into bed with BDT

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

Backing up to tape in an autoloader or small library could be heading for the graveyard if an Imation deal with BDT comes good.

BDT is a white-box manufacturer of tape autoloaders and libraries, devices with up to four tape drives and 96 slots for cartridges. They are used in small and medium businesses (SMBs) to back up data for several days at a time and then store the cartridges offsite in the autoloader case, or keep them in a library for faster restore from the bank of up to 96 tapes.

One of its most popular lines is an 8-slot autoloader for DLT and LTO tapes. BDT's past and present OEM customers include Dell, HP, IBM, Iomega, Quantum Corporation, Sun Microsystems, Tandberg Data, and Xerox.

Imation makes tape media but knows that the tape business is in a long-term decline because reading and writing is slow, compared to disk, and the costs of long-term storage on disk are going down due to increased hard drive capacity and deduplication. Tape is still the long term low-cost storage king for bulk data, petabytes of the stuff, but increasingly disk is the preferred choice for smaller amounts of data.

Imation has a manufacturing deal with ProStor, inventor of the RDX removable disk drive technology, to make the 2.5-inch drive cartridges, maxing out at 1TB, and docks into which the drive cartridges are loaded. Recently both Quantum and Toshiba agreed to supply such systems, sourced either from Imation or the other drive and dock manufacturer, Tandberg Data.

Imation has an agreement with ProStor that runs until 2020 and invested $5m in the company in March, an earnest of its intent to become more deeply involved.

BDT AG is the third licensed manufacture of RDX products, signing with ProStor in April, and Imation has just signed a deal with BDT to "market and commercialise new multi-cartridge RDX devices that combine the ease of automation with the benefits of RDX removable hard disk drive backup systems."

The big difference between a tape automation device and an RDX one is that you don't need a robot mechanism to move cartridges to drives, as each RDX cartridge contains a drive, and each slot will be, we expect, a dock. This means that the device controller switches I/O to and from loaded docks (slots) instead of moving cartridges to drives, making its response faster.

Although BDT has had an RDX licence since April, no product has emerged. The Imation deal suggests things are moving, with Imation possibly supplying the drives and docks, which BDT will assemble into the devices.

How will BDT's device software present the drives?

They could be presented as virtual tape cartridges with a one-for-one relationship. The whole device could be presented as a virtual tape library (VTL), with the twist that you could remove cartridges for off-site storage - something not possible with existing VTLs using fixed disk drives. The device could have a NAS interface, as many VTLS do, and be a pure disk-based data protection product. The device software is the key to this. One way to increase its cost-effectiveness would be to include deduplication, as Tandberg Data does with its Accugard products.

Imation SVP and chief technology officer Subodh Kulkarni talked of an RDX library, saying: "Our partnership with BDT will extend the highly popular RDX platform into affordable, high-quality automated solutions … by bringing the benefits of library automation to RDX, we can offer users even more efficiency and capacity in a very cost-effective solution.”

We might envisage something like a range of devices with, say, 12, 24, 48, and 96-dock capacities, a VTL interface so that existing backup software products can be used, and a deduplication option. There might even be replication to a remote device. The LTO tape format could be supported and, if BDT and Imation are adventurous, the DAT format as well at the low end. That format has a good penetration in the SMB market and HP supplies a 10-slot, 1-drive DAT autoloader that could be ripe for plucking.

The earliest arrival date for BDT RDX library product is probably the first half of next year. We would expect existing BDT and RDX OEMs to take the product and so put another brick into the wall confining the tape business into a steadily shrinking sector of the market. ®

Internet Security Threat Report 2014

More from The Register

next story
Docker's app containers are coming to Windows Server, says Microsoft
MS chases app deployment speeds already enjoyed by Linux devs
IBM storage revenues sink: 'We are disappointed,' says CEO
Time to put the storage biz up for sale?
'Hmm, why CAN'T I run a water pipe through that rack of media servers?'
Leaving Las Vegas for Armenia kludging and Dubai dune bashing
'Urika': Cray unveils new 1,500-core big data crunching monster
6TB of DRAM, 38TB of SSD flash and 120TB of disk storage
Facebook slurps 'paste sites' for STOLEN passwords, sprinkles on hash and salt
Zuck's ad empire DOESN'T see details in plain text. Phew!
SDI wars: WTF is software defined infrastructure?
This time we play for ALL the marbles
Windows 10: Forget Cloudobile, put Security and Privacy First
But - dammit - It would be insane to say 'don't collect, because NSA'
prev story

Whitepapers

Forging a new future with identity relationship management
Learn about ForgeRock's next generation IRM platform and how it is designed to empower CEOS's and enterprises to engage with consumers.
Cloud and hybrid-cloud data protection for VMware
Learn how quick and easy it is to configure backups and perform restores for VMware environments.
Three 1TB solid state scorchers up for grabs
Big SSDs can be expensive but think big and think free because you could be the lucky winner of one of three 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO drives that we’re giving away worth over £300 apiece.
Reg Reader Research: SaaS based Email and Office Productivity Tools
Read this Reg reader report which provides advice and guidance for SMBs towards the use of SaaS based email and Office productivity tools.
Security for virtualized datacentres
Legacy security solutions are inefficient due to the architectural differences between physical and virtual environments.